Salar Mesdaghinia

11 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Salar Mesdaghinia
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 186
  • Information Systems and Management 71
  • Demography 51
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 10
  • Social Psychology 77
Replace Jen‐Wei Cheng with:
Jen‐Wei Cheng Taiwan
Asma Zafar Canada
Jin Cheng China
Robert Steinbauer United States
Guanglei Zhang China
Jun Song China
Poornima Madan India
Liao Jian-qiao China
Wiebke Doden United Kingdom
Marc Solga Germany
Salar Mesdaghinia relative to Jen‐Wei Cheng Taiwan Jen‐Wei Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jen‐Wei Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Salar Mesdaghinia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Salar Mesdaghinia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Salar Mesdaghinia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Salar Mesdaghinia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Salar Mesdaghinia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Salar Mesdaghinia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Salar Mesdaghinia. The network helps show where Salar Mesdaghinia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Salar Mesdaghinia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Salar Mesdaghinia Line = papers co-authored together Salar Mesdaghinia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2018144
2 202080
3 202220
4 202318
5 201711
6 20218
7 20204
8 20222
9 20222
10 20171
11 20191

About Salar Mesdaghinia

Salar Mesdaghinia is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Demography, having authored 11 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers), Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (2 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (2 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (1 paper) and Emotional Labor in Professions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (186 citations), Information Systems and Management (71 citations), Demography (51 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (10 citations) and Social Psychology (77 citations). Salar Mesdaghinia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Eisenberger, Lynn M. Shore, Michael T. Ford, Louis C. Buffardi, James N. Kurtessis, Thomas Rockstuhl, Debra L. Shapiro, Zihan Liu, Xueqi Wen and Pedro Neves. Their work appears in journals such as Group & Organization Management, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of International Business Studies, Journal of Management and Journal of Change Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact