Karen Holcombe Ehrhart
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Amy E. RandelMichelle A. DeanLynn M. ShoreBeth G. ChungGangaram SinghJonathan C. ZiegertUma KedharnathBeth G. Chung‐Herrera
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers)Employer Branding and e-HRM (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
Karen Holcombe Ehrhart
26 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.6k
- Gender Studies 1.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 963
- Social Psychology 551
- Strategy and Management 324
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Holcombe Ehrhart
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Holcombe Ehrhart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Holcombe Ehrhart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Holcombe Ehrhart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Holcombe Ehrhart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Holcombe Ehrhart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Holcombe Ehrhart. The network helps show where Karen Holcombe Ehrhart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Holcombe Ehrhart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Holcombe Ehrhart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Holcombe Ehrhart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Holcombe Ehrhart. Karen Holcombe Ehrhart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 133 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 102 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 80 | |
| 9 | Inclusion and Diversity in Work Groups: A Review and Model for Future Researchbreakdown → | 1120 |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | Diversity in organizations: Where are we now and where are we going?breakdown → | 386 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 65 | |
| 16 | 265 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Karen Holcombe Ehrhart
Karen Holcombe Ehrhart is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies and Marketing, having authored 26 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (12 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers) and Employer Branding and e-HRM (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.6k citations), Gender Studies (1.2k citations) and Communication (311 citations). Karen Holcombe Ehrhart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Amy E. Randel, Michelle A. Dean, Lynn M. Shore, Beth G. Chung, Gangaram Singh, Jonathan C. Ziegert, Uma Kedharnath, Beth G. Chung‐Herrera, Benjamin M. Galvin and Mark G. Ehrhart. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Management and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.