Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to John D. Bransford John D. Bransford (= 1×)
peers
L. S. Vygotsky
Countries citing papers authored by John D. Bransford
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Bransford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Bransford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Bransford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Bransford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Bransford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Bransford. The network helps show where John D. Bransford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John D. Bransford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John D. Bransford.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John D. Bransford based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John D. Bransford. John D. Bransford is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Svihla, Vanessa, et al.. (2009). MUVEs and Experiential Learning: Some Examples.. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 5(5). 4.3 indexed citations
6.
Svihla, Vanessa, et al.. (2009). Interactive Learning Assessments for the 21st Century.. Education Canada. 49(3). 44–47.4 indexed citations
7.
Svihla, Vanessa, et al.. (2008). Considerations for the development of a preparation for future learning assessment. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 273–280.2 indexed citations
8.
Davis, Joan, et al.. (2008). Do higher levels of arousal predict better learning? an investigation of learning and physiological responses. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 72–74.1 indexed citations
Davis, Joan, et al.. (2006). The role of people knowledge in learning narrative and domain content. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 914–915.5 indexed citations
11.
Leelawong, Krittaya, et al.. (2003). Teachable Agents: Learning by Teaching Environments for Science Domains.. Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 109–116.7 indexed citations
12.
Biswas, Gautam, Daniel L. Schwartz, & John D. Bransford. (2001). Technology support for complex problem solving: from SAD environments to AI. MIT Press eBooks. 71–97.66 indexed citations
13.
Barron, Brigid, Daniel L. Schwartz, Nancy Vye, et al.. (1998). Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 7(3). 271–311.731 indexed citations breakdown →
Bransford, John D., et al.. (1991). Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology archive. 16–18.30 indexed citations
16.
Vosniadou, Stella, Lance J. Rips, Edward E. Smith, et al.. (1989). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1600 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Bransford, John D.. (1986). Teaching Thinking: Evaluating Evaluations and Broadening the Data Base.. Educational leadership. 44(2). 68–70.7 indexed citations
18.
Bransford, John D.. (1986). Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving.. American Psychologist. 41(10).166 indexed citations
19.
Bransford, John D. & Barry S. Stein. (1984). The ideal problem solver : a guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity.207 indexed citations
20.
Vye, Nancy & John D. Bransford. (1981). Programs for Teaching Thinking.. Educational leadership. 39(1). 26–28.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.