Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action
19942.0k citationsEsther Thelen, Linda B. SmithThe MIT Press eBooksprofile →
Similarity and Analogical Reasoning
19891.6k citationsStella Vosniadou, Lance J. Rips et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Linda B. Smith Linda B. Smith (= 1×)
peers
Keith J. Holyoak
Countries citing papers authored by Linda B. Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Linda B. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda B. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda B. Smith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda B. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda B. Smith. The network helps show where Linda B. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Linda B. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Linda B. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Linda B. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Linda B. Smith. Linda B. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Abney, Drew H., et al.. (2018). Hand-Eye Coordination and Visual Attention in Infancy.. Cognitive Science.2 indexed citations
3.
Liu, Weiyang, Bo Dai, Ahmad Humayun, et al.. (2017). Iterative machine teaching. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2149–2158.17 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Linda B., et al.. (2017). Cake or Hat? Words Change How Young Children Process Visual Objects.. Cognitive Science.1 indexed citations
5.
Bambach, Sven, David Crandall, Linda B. Smith, & Yu Chen. (2016). Active Viewing in Toddlers Facilitates Visual Object Learning: An Egocentric Vision Approach.. Cognitive Science.12 indexed citations
Yurovsky, Daniel, Ricardo A. H. Bion, Linda B. Smith, & Anne Fernald. (2012). Mutual Exclusivity and Vocabulary Development. Cognitive Science. 34(34).2 indexed citations
9.
Boedecker, Joschka, et al.. (2011). Between frustration and elation: sense of control regulates the lntrinsic motivation for motor learning. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 10–15.3 indexed citations
10.
Ionescu, Thea, et al.. (2010). Dimension Word Knowledge and Flexible Attention Shifting. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).2 indexed citations
11.
Morse, Anthony, Tony Belpaeme, Angelo Cangelosi, & Linda B. Smith. (2010). Thinking With Your Body: Modelling Spatial Biases in Categorization Using a Real Humanoid Robot. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32).13 indexed citations
12.
Son, Ji Y., Linda B. Smith, & Robert L. Goldstone. (2007). Re-representation Using Labels: Comparison or Replacement?. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29).1 indexed citations
13.
Goldstone, Robert L., Linda B. Smith, & Ji Y. Son. (2006). Generalizing from Simple Instances: An Uncomplicated Lesson from Kids Learning Object Categories. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).1 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Linda B. & Chen Yu. (2006). Statistical Cross-Situational Learning to Build Word-to-World Mappings. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).8 indexed citations
15.
Yoshida, Hanako, et al.. (2001). Competition between linguistic cues and perceptual cues in children's categorization: English- and Japanese-speaking children - eScholarship. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 23(23).2 indexed citations
16.
Regier, Terry, et al.. (2001). The Emergence of Words. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23).11 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Linda B., et al.. (2000). Committing to an Ontology: A Connectionist Account. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 22(22).3 indexed citations
Smith, Linda B. & Esther Thelen. (1993). A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications.. The MIT Press eBooks.167 indexed citations
20.
Vosniadou, Stella, Lance J. Rips, Edward E. Smith, et al.. (1989). Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1600 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.