Jan‐Joost Rethans
Impact in
- Family Practice top 0.2%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Research and Theory top 2%
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 26
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 32
- Co-authors
- Cees van der VleutenJennifer ClelandKeiko AbeF. SturmansSok Ying LiawPiyanee Klainin‐YobasLonneke BokkenAlbert J.J.A. Scherpbier
- Journals
- Medical Education (9 papers)Family Practice (5 papers)Medical Teacher (5 papers)Academic Medicine (4 papers)Resuscitation (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jan‐Joost Rethans
58 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Family Practice 676
- Research and Theory 69
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.3k
- General Health Professions 980
- Health Information Management 142
Countries citing papers authored by Jan‐Joost Rethans
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan‐Joost Rethans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan‐Joost Rethans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan‐Joost Rethans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan‐Joost Rethans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan‐Joost Rethans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan‐Joost Rethans. The network helps show where Jan‐Joost Rethans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan‐Joost Rethans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 65 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 312 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 89 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 42 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 30 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 13 | |
| 18 | Verschillende visies van huisartsen en reumatologen op de zorg voor patiënten met reumatoïde artritis | 1996 | 3 |
| 19 | 1996 | 46 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 35 |
About Jan‐Joost Rethans
Jan‐Joost Rethans is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services and Physiology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (32 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (26 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (19 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (13 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (7 papers) and Radiology practices and education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (676 citations), Research and Theory (69 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.3k citations), General Health Professions (980 citations) and Health Information Management (142 citations). Jan‐Joost Rethans has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cees van der Vleuten, Jennifer Cleland, Keiko Abe, F. Sturmans, Sok Ying Liaw, Piyanee Klainin‐Yobas, Lonneke Bokken, Albert J.J.A. Scherpbier, Albert Scherpbier and Jo Goedhuys. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Family Practice, Medical Teacher, Academic Medicine and Resuscitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.