Emergency Medical Services

357.1k papers and 6.1M indexed citations i.

About

357.1k papers covering Emergency Medical Services have received a total of 6.1M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis, Pediatric health and respiratory diseases and Global Health Workforce Issues and also cover the fields of General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and General Health Professions. Some of the most active scholars covering Emergency Medical Services are David W. Bates, Peter J. Barnes, Jens Ove Andreasen, Lucian L. Leape, Dennis G. Maki, Charles Vincent, Pat Croskerry, Issam Raad, Shizuo Akira and David C. Classen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Emergency Medical Services

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Emergency Medical Services. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Emergency Medical Services.

Countries where authors publish papers about Emergency Medical Services

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Emergency Medical Services. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Emergency Medical Services with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergency Medical Services more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025