Jane Kidd

3.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
32 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

Jane Kidd is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Kidd has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 11 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Kidd's work include Innovations in Medical Education (17 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers). Jane Kidd is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (17 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers). Jane Kidd collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Brazil. Jane Kidd's co-authors include Debra Nestel, David Davies, Theresa M. Marteau, Jill Thistlethwaite, Colin Macdougall, Judith Purkis, Diane Clay, Roger Kneebone, Ara Darzi and Robert W. Shaw and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

Jane Kidd

31 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

The effectiveness of case-based learning in health profes... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Kidd United Kingdom 20 1.1k 560 512 385 331 32 2.4k
Craig Mellis Australia 34 1.5k 1.4× 677 1.2× 796 1.6× 449 1.2× 200 0.6× 94 3.3k
Patricia B. Mullan United States 24 1.2k 1.1× 581 1.0× 205 0.4× 156 0.4× 294 0.9× 94 2.1k
Michael Fordis United States 13 1.5k 1.4× 778 1.4× 212 0.4× 263 0.7× 183 0.6× 27 2.5k
Elizabeth Armstrong United States 23 924 0.9× 435 0.8× 264 0.5× 359 0.9× 202 0.6× 81 1.7k
Malathi Srinivasan United States 22 1.1k 1.0× 678 1.2× 390 0.8× 155 0.4× 122 0.4× 94 2.1k
Christopher M. Wittich United States 25 828 0.8× 458 0.8× 254 0.5× 112 0.3× 147 0.4× 64 1.9k
Jan D. Carline United States 29 2.0k 1.8× 1.1k 1.9× 151 0.3× 191 0.5× 136 0.4× 75 3.0k
Arno M. M. Muijtjens Netherlands 29 1.4k 1.3× 416 0.7× 631 1.2× 284 0.7× 194 0.6× 87 2.6k
Joke Denekens Belgium 18 581 0.5× 719 1.3× 158 0.3× 187 0.5× 105 0.3× 42 2.6k
Robbert Duvivier Netherlands 21 1.2k 1.1× 458 0.8× 378 0.7× 312 0.8× 277 0.8× 78 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Kidd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Kidd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Kidd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Kidd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Kidd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Kidd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Kidd. The network helps show where Jane Kidd may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Kidd

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Kidd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Kidd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Kidd. Jane Kidd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bowrey, David J. & Jane Kidd. (2014). How Do Early Emotional Experiences in the Operating Theatre Influence Medical Student Learning in This Environment?. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 26(2). 113–120. 20 indexed citations
2.
Bateman, James, et al.. (2013). Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study. Medical Education. 47(6). 595–606. 48 indexed citations
3.
Bateman, James, Maggie Allen, Jane Kidd, Nick Parsons, & David Davies. (2012). Virtual patients design and its effect on clinical reasoning and student experience: a protocol for a randomised factorial multi-centre study. BMC Medical Education. 12(1). 62–62. 43 indexed citations
4.
Thistlethwaite, Jill, David Davies, Jane Kidd, et al.. (2012). The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Medical Teacher. 34(6). e421–e444. 723 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Nestel, Debra & Jane Kidd. (2006). Nurses' perceptions and experiences of communication in the operating theatre: a focus group interview. BMC Nursing. 5(1). 1–1. 68 indexed citations
6.
Wetzel, Cordula M., Roger Kneebone, Maria Woloshynowych, et al.. (2006). The effects of stress on surgical performance. The American Journal of Surgery. 191(1). 5–10. 330 indexed citations
7.
Nestel, Debra & Jane Kidd. (2005). Peer assisted learning in patient-centred interviewing: the impact on student tutors. Medical Teacher. 27(5). 439–444. 90 indexed citations
8.
Kidd, Jane, et al.. (2004). Assessment of communication in surgical trainees. Medical Education. 38(5). 555–556. 1 indexed citations
9.
Nestel, Debra & Jane Kidd. (2004). Teaching and Learning about Written Communications in a United Kingdom Medical School. Education for Health. 17(1). 27–34. 12 indexed citations
10.
Nestel, Debra, Roger Kneebone, & Jane Kidd. (2003). Teaching and learning about skills in minor surgery. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 12(2). 291–296. 36 indexed citations
11.
Nestel, Debra & Jane Kidd. (2003). Peer tutoring in patient-centred interviewing skills: experience of a project for first-year students. Medical Teacher. 25(4). 398–403. 94 indexed citations
12.
Nestel, Debra, Jane Kidd, & Roger Kneebone. (2003). Communicating during procedures: development of a rating scale. Medical Education. 37(5). 480–481. 7 indexed citations
13.
Nestel, Debra, et al.. (2002). Modelling the lay expert for first-year medical students: the actor-patient as teacher. Medical Teacher. 24(5). 562–564. 14 indexed citations
14.
Nestel, Debra, Jane Kidd, & V. James. (2002). Interprofessional shared learning: a workshop on communication for screening blood donors. 1(4). 229–237. 2 indexed citations
15.
Kneebone, Roger, et al.. (2002). An innovative model for teaching and learning clinical procedures. Medical Education. 36(7). 628–634. 214 indexed citations
16.
Nestel, Debra & Jane Kidd. (2002). Evaluating a teaching skills workshop for medical students. Medical Education. 36(11). 1094–1095. 12 indexed citations
17.
Marteau, Theresa M., et al.. (1993). Obstetricians presenting amniocentesis to pregnant women: Practice observed. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. 11(1). 3–10. 50 indexed citations
18.
Marteau, Theresa M., Jane Kidd, Rachel Cook, et al.. (1992). Psychological effects of having amniocentesis: Are these due to the procedure, the risk or the behaviour?. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 36(4). 395–402. 29 indexed citations
19.
Marteau, Theresa M., Jane Kidd, Rachel Cook, et al.. (1991). Perceived risk not actual risk predicts uptake of amniocentesis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 98(3). 282–286. 78 indexed citations
20.
Marteau, Theresa M., Marie Johnston, Robert W. Shaw, et al.. (1989). The impact of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing upon the cognitions, emotions and behaviour of pregnant women. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 33(1). 7–16. 59 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026