Jane Kidd
- Family Practice top 0.5%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 4
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 17
- Research and Theory top 10%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 7
- Emergency Medical Services top 2%
-
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 6
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare 5
-
- Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare 4
-
- Reflective Practices in Education 4
-
- Healthcare Systems and Technology 3
Jane Kidd
31 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
- Family Practice 290
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
- Research and Theory 27
- General Health Professions 560
- Emergency Medical Services 136
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Kidd
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Kidd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Kidd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Kidd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Kidd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Kidd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Kidd. The network helps show where Jane Kidd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Kidd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 4 | The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23breakdown → | 2012 | 723 |
| 5 | 2009 | 129 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 330 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 68 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 90 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 94 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 214 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 78 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 59 |
About Jane Kidd
Jane Kidd is a scholar working on Family Practice, Anatomy and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 32 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (17 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (290 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations) and Research and Theory (27 citations). Jane Kidd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Debra Nestel, David Davies, Theresa M. Marteau, Judith Purkis, Diane Clay, Colin Macdougall, Jill Thistlethwaite, Roger Kneebone, Ara Darzi and Marie Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Medical Teacher, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Lara D. Veeken and Patient Education and Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.