Physiology
336.2k papers receiving 4.5M citations
Countries where authors publish papers about Physiology
This map shows the geographic impact of research in Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physiology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about Physiology
This network shows the impact of papers covering Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Physiology.
About Physiology
2.0M papers covering Physiology have received a total of 63.6M indexed citations since 1951 . Papers on Physiology are most often about the specific topic of Diet and metabolism studies, Adipose Tissue and Metabolism, Asthma and respiratory diseases, Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects, Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology, Pain Mechanisms and Treatments, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments and Biochemical effects in animals and also cover the fields of Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Aging, Cell Biology, Biochemistry and Immunology and Allergy. Papers citing work on Physiology are usually about Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Aging, Biological Psychiatry, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Some of the most active scholars covering Physiology are Dennis J. Selkoe, Peter John Barnes, Salvador Moncada, Mark P. Mattson, Bruce M. Spiegelman, Clifford J. Woolf, John Hardy, Gökhan S. Hotamışlıgil, Judith Campisi and Ronald Melzack.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.