Jean Ker

2.9k total citations
80 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Jean Ker is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Jean Ker has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 28 papers in General Health Professions and 24 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Jean Ker's work include Innovations in Medical Education (52 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (22 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (21 papers). Jean Ker is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (52 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (22 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (21 papers). Jean Ker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Kuwait. Jean Ker's co-authors include Ronald M. Harden, Charlotte E. Rees, M H Davis, Peter Howie, Martin J. Pippard, Paul A. Bradley, Jennifer Cleland, Lisi Gordon, Peter Davey and Gominda Ponnamperuma and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Urology and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

In The Last Decade

Jean Ker

78 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jean Ker United Kingdom	25	1.2k	495	453	451	403	80	2.0k
H. Carrie Chen United States	21	1.8k 1.4×	798 1.6×	203 0.4×	770 1.7×	296 0.7×	44	2.2k
Jan Illing United Kingdom	24	1.2k 1.0×	852 1.7×	166 0.4×	327 0.7×	133 0.3×	74	2.0k
Linda A. Headrick United States	26	1.3k 1.0×	1.2k 2.4×	227 0.5×	371 0.8×	166 0.4×	63	2.5k
Jan‐Joost Rethans Netherlands	30	1.3k 1.1×	980 2.0×	127 0.3×	676 1.5×	710 1.8×	62	2.5k
W. Dale Dauphinée Canada	21	816 0.7×	392 0.8×	201 0.4×	312 0.7×	68 0.2×	47	1.5k
Amy V. Blue United States	25	1.2k 1.0×	873 1.8×	278 0.6×	217 0.5×	107 0.3×	119	1.9k
Peter Cantillon Ireland	21	1.3k 1.0×	613 1.2×	437 1.0×	397 0.9×	126 0.3×	67	1.8k
F M Wolf United States	9	1.1k 0.9×	985 2.0×	107 0.2×	256 0.6×	129 0.3×	26	2.1k
Jennifer R. Kogan United States	26	2.3k 1.9×	631 1.3×	296 0.7×	1.4k 3.1×	299 0.7×	83	2.8k
Michael B. Donnelly United States	29	1.4k 1.2×	463 0.9×	305 0.7×	622 1.4×	194 0.5×	91	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Jean Ker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jean Ker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean Ker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean Ker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jean Ker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean Ker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean Ker. The network helps show where Jean Ker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean Ker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean Ker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean Ker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean Ker. Jean Ker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

McLeod, Graeme, et al.. (2019). Validity and reliability of metrics for translation of regional anaesthesia performance from cadavers to patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 123(3). 368–377. 17 indexed citations

Ker, Jean, et al.. (2017). Exploring the influence of context on feedback at medical school: a video-ethnography study. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 23(1). 159–186. 23 indexed citations

Lowe, David J., et al.. (2016). Exploring situational awareness in emergency medicine: developing a shared mental model to enhance training and assessment. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 92(1093). 653–658. 38 indexed citations

McGuire, Andrew, et al.. (2015). Pharmacy support in developing prescribing skills. The Clinical Teacher. 12(6). 408–412. 1 indexed citations

Ker, Jean, et al.. (2013). Levels of reflective thinking and patient safety: an investigation of the mechanisms that impact on student learning in a single cohort over a 5 year curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 19(3). 297–310. 20 indexed citations

Ker, Jean, et al.. (2013). Mental health care training for practitioners in remote and rural areas. The Clinical Teacher. 10(6). 384–388. 4 indexed citations

Wake, Deborah J., et al.. (2013). Reflecting in the Middle East: blossoming trees. The Clinical Teacher. 10(4). 264–265. 1 indexed citations

Erolin, Caroline, et al.. (2012). Creation of abdominal palpation model prototype for training of medical students in detection and diagnosis of liver disease. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine. 35(3). 104–114. 7 indexed citations

Ker, Jean, et al.. (2012). Using simulation to support doctors in difficulty. The Clinical Teacher. 9(5). 285–289. 12 indexed citations

10.

Mires, Gary, et al.. (2012). Direct observed procedural skills assessment in the undergraduate setting. The Clinical Teacher. 9(4). 228–232. 24 indexed citations

11.

Ryan, Colleen, Peter Davey, Jill Francis, et al.. (2011). The prevalence of prescribing errors amongst junior doctors in Scotland. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 10 indexed citations

12.

Mires, Gary, et al.. (2011). The use of the Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) assessment tool in the clinical setting - the perceptions of students. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 5(2). 102–107. 3 indexed citations

13.

Cantillon, Peter, et al.. (2010). Simulated patient programmes in Europe: Collegiality or separate development?. Medical Teacher. 32(3). e106–e110. 16 indexed citations

14.

Byrne, D.J., et al.. (2008). How useful is simulation in preparing students for practice in the ambulatory care setting. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 2(1). 17–20. 1 indexed citations

15.

Burnett, Emma, G. Phillips, & Jean Ker. (2008). From theory to practice in learning about healthcare associated infections: Reliable assessment of final year medical students’ ability to reflect. Medical Teacher. 30(6). e157–e160. 17 indexed citations

16.

Davis, Margery H., Gominda Ponnamperuma, & Jean Ker. (2008). Student perceptions of a portfolio assessment process. Medical Education. 43(1). 89–98. 63 indexed citations

17.

Ker, Jean, et al.. (2008). Use of simulated patients for a communication skills exercise. Nursing Standard. 22(19). 39–44. 15 indexed citations

18.

Ker, Jean, et al.. (2007). Assessment of final year medical students in a simulated ward:: developing content validity for an assessment instrument. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee). 1(1). 33–36. 3 indexed citations

19.

Ker, Jean, et al.. (2005). PRHO views on the usefulness of a pilot ward simulation exercise. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 66(3). 168–170. 11 indexed citations

20.

Reid, Marvin, et al.. (2000). Training specialist registrars in general surgery: a qualitative study in Tayside.. PubMed. 45(5). 304–10. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact