Ron Winkens

2.3k total citations
72 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Ron Winkens is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Family Practice and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ron Winkens has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in General Health Professions, 16 papers in Family Practice and 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ron Winkens's work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (14 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (11 papers). Ron Winkens is often cited by papers focused on Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (14 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (11 papers). Ron Winkens collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Taiwan. Ron Winkens's co-authors include J. André Knottnerus, Richard Grol, P. Pop, Arnold D.M. Kester, Jeremy Grimshaw, Johan L. Severens, Cynthia Fraser, Ruth Thomas, Ayub Akbari and Liz Glidewell and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Ron Winkens

67 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ron Winkens Netherlands 24 765 341 339 331 279 72 1.7k
Ilkka Kunnamo Finland 26 458 0.6× 260 0.8× 106 0.3× 420 1.3× 312 1.1× 77 2.1k
David T. Liss United States 23 618 0.8× 261 0.8× 162 0.5× 304 0.9× 280 1.0× 70 1.8k
Judith Charlton United Kingdom 27 471 0.6× 190 0.6× 156 0.5× 295 0.9× 549 2.0× 44 2.2k
R. Grol Netherlands 13 1.5k 2.0× 777 2.3× 212 0.6× 1.4k 4.3× 295 1.1× 15 3.1k
Laurence F. McMahon United States 33 992 1.3× 884 2.6× 80 0.2× 284 0.9× 429 1.5× 87 3.1k
Delphine S. Tuot United States 27 757 1.0× 244 0.7× 259 0.8× 316 1.0× 267 1.0× 104 2.2k
Robert J. Stroebel United States 19 692 0.9× 281 0.8× 128 0.4× 285 0.9× 315 1.1× 56 1.5k
Marjolein Lugtenberg Netherlands 20 608 0.8× 470 1.4× 85 0.3× 528 1.6× 351 1.3× 51 1.9k
Rajeev Chaudhry United States 26 523 0.7× 166 0.5× 141 0.4× 372 1.1× 360 1.3× 99 1.9k
Patrice François France 23 494 0.6× 100 0.3× 172 0.5× 262 0.8× 378 1.4× 104 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Ron Winkens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ron Winkens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ron Winkens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ron Winkens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ron Winkens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ron Winkens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ron Winkens. The network helps show where Ron Winkens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ron Winkens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ron Winkens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ron Winkens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ron Winkens. Ron Winkens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Joore, Manuela, et al.. (2010). Cost-effectiveness of involving nurse specialists for adult patients with urinary incontinence in primary care: an economic evaluation alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial based on generic health related quality of life and urinary incontinence specific outcomes. Neurourology and Urodynamics.
3.
4.
Winkens, Ron, et al.. (2009). Quality of communication during telephone triage at Dutch out-of-hours centres. Patient Education and Counseling. 74(2). 174–178. 50 indexed citations
5.
Weijden, Trudy van der, et al.. (2009). Cascade effects of laboratory testing are found to be rare in low disease probability situations: prospective cohort study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 63(4). 452–458. 7 indexed citations
6.
Akbari, Ayub, Alain Mayhew, Jeremy Grimshaw, et al.. (2008). Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. CD005471–CD005471. 317 indexed citations
7.
Berghmans, Bary, Manuela Joore, Toine Lagro‐Janssen, et al.. (2008). The effects of involving a nurse practitioner in primary care for adult patients with urinary incontinence: The PromoCon study (Promoting Continence). BMC Health Services Research. 8(1). 84–84. 18 indexed citations
8.
Rethans, Jan‐Joost, et al.. (2008). Quality of clinical aspects of call handling at Dutch out of hours centres: cross sectional national study. BMJ. 337(sep12 1). a1264–a1264. 57 indexed citations
9.
Beijer, Sandra, Nicole E. G. Wijckmans, Elisabeth F. C. van Rossum, et al.. (2008). Treatment adherence and patients’ acceptance of home infusions with adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) in palliative home care. Supportive Care in Cancer. 16(12). 1419–1424. 4 indexed citations
10.
Weijden, Trudy van der, et al.. (2007). Feasibility and acceptability of a computerised system with automated reminders for prescribing behaviour in primary care. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 77(3). 199–207. 22 indexed citations
11.
Weijden, Trudy van der, et al.. (2006). Reasons for ordering spinal x-ray investigations: how they influence general practitioners' management.. PubMed. 52(10). 1266–7. 3 indexed citations
13.
Baur, L.H.B., et al.. (2005). Easy Access Echocardiography for the General Practicioner: Results from the Parkstad Area in The Netherlands. International journal of cardiac imaging. 22(1). 19–25. 7 indexed citations
14.
Heijde, Désirée van der, et al.. (2003). [The value of joint general practitioner and rheumatologist consultations in primary care patients].. PubMed. 147(10). 447–50. 2 indexed citations
15.
Hasman, Arie, et al.. (2003). The Reliability of Assessing the Appropriateness of Requested Diagnostic Tests. Medical Decision Making. 23(1). 31–37. 9 indexed citations
16.
Winkens, Ron, et al.. (2000). A test ordering system with automated reminders for primary care based on practice guidelines. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 58-59. 219–233. 21 indexed citations
17.
Winkens, Ron, J. André Knottnerus, Arnold D.M. Kester, Richard Grol, & P. Pop. (1997). Fitting a routine health-care activity into a randomized trial: An experiment possible without informed consent?. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 50(4). 435–439. 24 indexed citations
18.
Hasman, Arie, et al.. (1993). To test or not to test, that is the question. Clinica Chimica Acta. 222(1-2). 49–56. 6 indexed citations
19.
Winkens, Ron, et al.. (1993). Influencing Diagnostic and Preventive Performance in Ambulatory Care by Feedback and Reminders. A Review. Family Practice. 10(2). 219–228. 78 indexed citations
20.
Trienekens, T. A. M., et al.. (1989). Different lengths of treatment with co-trimoxazole for acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women.. BMJ. 299(6711). 1319–1322. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026