Michael Fordis
- Family Practice top 0.2%
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 4
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 3
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Health Sciences Research and Education 5
- Emergency Medical Services top 2%
-
- Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life 5
- Infant Development and Preterm Care 2
-
- Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare 4
-
- Family Support in Illness 4
-
- Congenital Heart Disease Studies 3
Michael Fordis
26 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Family Practice 536
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.5k
- General Health Professions 778
- Emergency Medical Services 182
- Health Information Management 115
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Fordis
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Fordis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Fordis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Fordis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Fordis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Fordis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Fordis. The network helps show where Michael Fordis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Fordis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 4 | Improving Childhood Cancer Survivor Care Through Web-Based Platforms. | 2018 | 15 |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 58 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 38 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 18 | Accuracy of Physician Self-assessment Compared With Observed Measures of Competencebreakdown → | 2006 | 1769 |
| 19 | 2005 | 314 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 28 |
About Michael Fordis
Michael Fordis is a scholar working on Family Practice, Speech and Hearing and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (536 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.5k citations) and General Health Professions (778 citations). Michael Fordis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David A. Davis, Paul E. Mazmanian, Laure Perrier, R. Van Harrison, Kevin E. Thorpe, Jason E. King, Stephen B. Greenberg, Stephen J. Spann, Christie M. Ballantyne and Peter H. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Academic Medicine, Seminars in Plastic Surgery, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions and Patient Education and Counseling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.