Nancy McNaughton
Impact in
- Family Practice top 0.2%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
-
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Medical Education and Admissions
Papers in
-
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 11
- Co-authors
- Brian HodgesGlenn RegehrWalther van MookRenée E. StalmeijerMark D. HansonRichard G. TiberiusPaula RavitzLorelei Lingard
- Journals
- Academic Medicine (9 papers)Medical Education (8 papers)Medical Teacher (6 papers)Academic Psychiatry (5 papers)The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nancy McNaughton
47 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Family Practice 653
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.3k
- General Health Professions 715
- Research and Theory 24
- Psychiatry and Mental health 348
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy McNaughton
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy McNaughton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy McNaughton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy McNaughton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy McNaughton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy McNaughton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy McNaughton. The network helps show where Nancy McNaughton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy McNaughton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 12 | Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91 Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 412 |
| 13 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 88 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 40 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 68 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 101 |
About Nancy McNaughton
Nancy McNaughton is a scholar working on Family Practice, Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (24 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (12 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (11 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (653 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.3k citations), General Health Professions (715 citations), Research and Theory (24 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (348 citations). Nancy McNaughton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian Hodges, Glenn Regehr, Walther van Mook, Renée E. Stalmeijer, Mark D. Hanson, Richard G. Tiberius, Paula Ravitz, Lorelei Lingard, Shiphra Ginsburg and Rose Hatala. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education, Medical Teacher, Academic Psychiatry and The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.