Heidi Loshbaugh

509 total citations
19 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Heidi Loshbaugh is a scholar working on Architecture, Media Technology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Heidi Loshbaugh has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Architecture, 8 papers in Media Technology and 7 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Heidi Loshbaugh's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (8 papers) and Career Development and Diversity (7 papers). Heidi Loshbaugh is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (8 papers) and Career Development and Diversity (7 papers). Heidi Loshbaugh collaborates with scholars based in United States. Heidi Loshbaugh's co-authors include Gary Lichtenstein, Sheri Sheppard, Sandra L. Laursen, Heather Thiry, Helen L. Chen, Ruth Streveler, Deborah Kilgore, Debbie Chachra, Helen Chen and Barbara Olds and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Engineering Education, Journal of Chemical Education and International journal of doctoral studies.

In The Last Decade

Heidi Loshbaugh

18 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Heidi Loshbaugh United States	9	142	135	132	62	36	19	297
Anita Patrick United States	10	156 1.1×	107 0.8×	110 0.8×	20 0.3×	23 0.6×	19	270
Renata Revelo United States	11	179 1.3×	118 0.9×	241 1.8×	42 0.7×	13 0.4×	39	401
Nathan Choe United States	11	96 0.7×	69 0.5×	127 1.0×	22 0.4×	76 2.1×	21	268
Eleanor L. Babco United States	4	156 1.1×	146 1.1×	170 1.3×	87 1.4×	15 0.4×	5	339
Laura Gelles United States	9	64 0.5×	104 0.8×	214 1.6×	31 0.5×	21 0.6×	23	353
Paige Smith United States	5	201 1.4×	55 0.4×	139 1.1×	21 0.3×	22 0.6×	14	324
Mee Joo Kim United States	6	106 0.7×	52 0.4×	196 1.5×	13 0.2×	17 0.5×	13	307
Natalie Tran United States	9	50 0.4×	69 0.5×	191 1.4×	48 0.8×	8 0.2×	21	319
Jennifer Kersten United States	4	53 0.4×	90 0.7×	292 2.2×	55 0.9×	16 0.4×	7	448
Heather Perkins United States	9	170 1.2×	51 0.4×	150 1.1×	7 0.1×	70 1.9×	33	328

Countries citing papers authored by Heidi Loshbaugh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heidi Loshbaugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heidi Loshbaugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heidi Loshbaugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heidi Loshbaugh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heidi Loshbaugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heidi Loshbaugh. The network helps show where Heidi Loshbaugh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heidi Loshbaugh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heidi Loshbaugh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heidi Loshbaugh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heidi Loshbaugh. Heidi Loshbaugh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Ward, Doug, et al.. (2024). How Universities Can Move Forward With Generative AI in Teaching and Learning. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning. 56(1). 47–54. 4 indexed citations

Weston, Timothy J., et al.. (2023). How Can Universities Support STEM Transfer Students? A Framework for Strategic Planning and Action. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning. 55(4). 11–22. 4 indexed citations

Chachra, Debbie, et al.. (2020). Being And Becoming: Gender And Identity Formation Of Engineering Students. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 13.250.1–13.250.20. 39 indexed citations

Loshbaugh, Heidi, et al.. (2020). Research Design Becomes Research Reality: Colorado School Of Mines Implements Research Methodology For The Center For The Advancement Of Engineering Education. 10.1074.1–10.1074.9. 6 indexed citations

Lichtenstein, Gary, et al.. (2020). Should I Stay Or Should I Go? Engineering Students' Persistence Is Based On Little Experience Or Data. 12.1277.1–12.1277.22. 18 indexed citations

Olds, Barbara, et al.. (2020). Change Remains Constant: Faculty Mini Grants Facilitate Undergraduate Curricular Reform At The Colorado School Of Mines. 9.299.1–9.299.13. 1 indexed citations

Kilgore, Deborah, et al.. (2020). Creative, Contextual, And Engaged: Are Women The Engineers Of 2020?. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 12.420.1–12.420.16. 7 indexed citations

O’Connor, Kevin, Daniel Amos, Tori Bailey, et al.. (2020). Sponsorship: Engineering’s Tacit Gatekeeper. 12.1295.1–12.1295.14. 4 indexed citations

Loshbaugh, Heidi, et al.. (2020). Engineering School, Life Balance, And The Student Experience. 11.573.1–11.573.13. 8 indexed citations

10.

Loshbaugh, Heidi, et al.. (2020). Geeks Are Chic: Cultural Identity And Engineering Students’ Pathways To The Profession. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 12.775.1–12.775.18. 9 indexed citations

11.

Matusovich, Holly, Ruth Streveler, Heidi Loshbaugh, Ronald L. Miller, & Barbara Olds. (2020). Will I Succeed In Engineering? Using Expectancy Value Theory In A Longitudinal Investigation Of Students’ Beliefs. 13.1403.1–13.1403.13. 13 indexed citations

12.

Thiry, Heather, Sandra L. Laursen, & Heidi Loshbaugh. (2015). “How do I get From Here to There?” An Examination of Ph.D. Science Students’ Career Preparation and Decision Making. International journal of doctoral studies. 10. 237–256. 40 indexed citations

13.

Loshbaugh, Heidi, Sandra L. Laursen, & Heather Thiry. (2011). Reactions to Changing Times: Trends and Tensions in U.S. Chemistry Graduate Education. Journal of Chemical Education. 88(6). 708–715. 14 indexed citations

14.

Lichtenstein, Gary, et al.. (2009). An Engineering Major Does Not (Necessarily) an Engineer Make: Career Decision Making Among Undergraduate Engineering Majors. Journal of Engineering Education. 98(3). 227–234. 100 indexed citations

15.

Matusovich, Holly, Ruth Streveler, Heidi Loshbaugh, Ronald L. Miller, & Barbara Olds. (2008). AC 2008-950: WILL I SUCCEED IN ENGINEERING? USING EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY IN A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF STUDENTS' BELIEFS. 14 indexed citations

16.

Matusovich, Holly, Ruth Streveler, Heidi Loshbaugh, R. L. Miller, & Barbara Olds. (2008). Will I Succeed in Engineering? Using Expectancy-Value Theory in a Longitudinal Investigation of Students' Beliefs. Research Brief.. 10 indexed citations

17.

Chachra, Debbie, et al.. (2008). Being and Becoming: Gender and Identity Formation of Engineering Students. Research Brief.. 3 indexed citations

18.

Loshbaugh, Heidi, et al.. (2007). Research Design Becomes Research Reality: Colorado School of Mines Implements Research Methodology for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education. Research Brief.. 1 indexed citations

19.

Chen, Helen, et al.. (2007). Development of the Persistence in Engineering (PIE) Survey Instrument. Research Brief.. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact