Ruth Streveler

2.7k total citations
118 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Ruth Streveler is a scholar working on Media Technology, Education and Architecture. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Streveler has authored 118 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 70 papers in Media Technology, 55 papers in Education and 42 papers in Architecture. Recurrent topics in Ruth Streveler's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (53 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (42 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (37 papers). Ruth Streveler is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (53 papers), Engineering Education and Pedagogy (42 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (37 papers). Ruth Streveler collaborates with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and Colombia. Ruth Streveler's co-authors include Ronald L. Miller, Karl A. Smith, Holly Matusovich, Paul S. Steif, Thomas Litzinger, Barbara Olds, Maura Borrego, Mary Nelson, Sheri Sheppard and Muhsin Menekşe and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Engineering Education and Education + Training.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Streveler

107 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Streveler United States 16 853 776 308 278 243 118 1.5k
Lisa Benson United States 24 688 0.8× 477 0.6× 137 0.4× 339 1.2× 290 1.2× 151 1.8k
Barbara Olds United States 17 754 0.9× 1.1k 1.4× 457 1.5× 112 0.4× 180 0.7× 84 1.7k
Heidi Diefes‐Dux United States 20 1.1k 1.3× 642 0.8× 359 1.2× 282 1.0× 534 2.2× 181 2.1k
Christine M. Cunningham United States 20 1.0k 1.2× 301 0.4× 232 0.8× 239 0.9× 611 2.5× 67 1.5k
Brenda Capobianco United States 22 1000 1.2× 266 0.3× 128 0.4× 345 1.2× 411 1.7× 72 1.4k
Şenay Purzer United States 17 592 0.7× 377 0.5× 138 0.4× 101 0.4× 217 0.9× 138 1.2k
Greg Pearson United States 9 786 0.9× 217 0.3× 134 0.4× 132 0.5× 314 1.3× 31 1.2k
Lisa McNair United States 14 407 0.5× 389 0.5× 88 0.3× 133 0.5× 104 0.4× 115 1.0k
S. Selcen Guzey United States 21 1.1k 1.3× 187 0.2× 74 0.2× 151 0.5× 375 1.5× 66 1.5k
Deborah Trytten United States 13 294 0.3× 329 0.4× 101 0.3× 304 1.1× 70 0.3× 48 767

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Streveler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Streveler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Streveler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Streveler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Streveler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Streveler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Streveler. The network helps show where Ruth Streveler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Streveler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Streveler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Streveler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Streveler. Ruth Streveler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Streveler, Ruth & Karl A. Smith. (2020). Opinion: Course Design in the Time of Coronavirus: Put on your Designer’s CAP. AEE Journal. 8(4). 1–19. 5 indexed citations
2.
Streveler, Ruth, et al.. (2019). Engineering students’ use of analogies and metaphors: implications for educators. International journal of engineering education. 35(1). 2–14. 2 indexed citations
3.
4.
Vieira, Camilo, et al.. (2018). The challenges of assessing transformative learning:Lessons learned from an instructional design workshop for colombian engineering faculty. International journal of engineering education. 34(5). 1604–1614. 1 indexed citations
5.
Streveler, Ruth, Gary Lichtenstein, Samantha Brunhaver, et al.. (2018). Professional engineering pathways study: The value of a community of practice to stimulate use of research findings that inform practice. 2 indexed citations
6.
Streveler, Ruth, Holly Matusovich, Samantha Brunhaver, et al.. (2017). Professional engineering pathways study: Using a community of practice model to propagate findings and engage the community. 1 indexed citations
8.
Montfort, Devlin, Geoffrey Herman, Shane Brown, et al.. (2015). Patterns of student conceptual understanding across engineering content areas. International journal of engineering education. 31(6). 1587–1604. 11 indexed citations
9.
Streveler, Ruth, et al.. (2015). Category mistakes, knowledge in pieces, or something else? problems in conceptually learning signal analysis. International journal of engineering education. 31(1). 58–71. 2 indexed citations
10.
Streveler, Ruth, et al.. (2015). Learning about engineering education research: What conceptual difficulties still exist for a new generation of scholars?. El Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad EAFIT (Universidad EAFIT). 1–6. 10 indexed citations
11.
Yang, Dazhi, Ruth Streveler, Ronald L. Miller, et al.. (2012). Using Computer-Based Online Learning Modules to Promote Conceptual Change: Helping Students Understand Difficult Concepts in Thermal and Transport Science. International journal of engineering education. 28(3). 686–700. 13 indexed citations
12.
Miller, Ronald L., et al.. (2011). IdentIfyIng and RepaIRIng Student MISconceptIonS In theRMal and tRanSpoRt ScIence: Concept Inventories and Schema Training Studies. Chemical Engineering Education. 16 indexed citations
13.
Miller, Ronald L., et al.. (2011). Fundamental Research in Engineering Education — Identifying and Repairing Student Misconceptions in Thermal and Transport Science: Concept Inventories and Schema Training Studies. Chemical Engineering Education. 45(3). 203–210. 6 indexed citations
14.
Streveler, Ruth, et al.. (2011). Rigorous Methodology for Concept Inventory Development: Using the 'Assessment Triangle' to Develop and Test the Thermal and Transport Science Concept Inventory (TTCI)*. International journal of engineering education. 27(5). 968–984. 44 indexed citations
15.
Smith, Karl A. & Ruth Streveler. (2010). Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. 61 indexed citations
16.
Matusovich, Holly, Ruth Streveler, Heidi Loshbaugh, Ronald L. Miller, & Barbara Olds. (2008). AC 2008-950: WILL I SUCCEED IN ENGINEERING? USING EXPECTANCY-VALUE THEORY IN A LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION OF STUDENTS' BELIEFS. 14 indexed citations
17.
Streveler, Ruth & Karl A. Smith. (2006). Conducting Rigorous Research in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education. 95(2). 103–105. 110 indexed citations
18.
Sheppard, Sheri, Cynthia J. Atman, Reed Stevens, et al.. (2004). Studying the engineering student experience: Design of a longitudinal study. 13091–13105. 40 indexed citations
19.
Rover, Diane T., et al.. (2004). Communities of practice in engineering education. 2. F2G_1–F2G_1. 9 indexed citations
20.
Streveler, Ruth, et al.. (2003). Using Boyer’s four forms of scholarship to advance engineering education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026