Nathan Choe

425 total citations
21 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

Nathan Choe is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Health Professions and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan Choe has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Safety Research, 9 papers in General Health Professions and 8 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Nathan Choe's work include Career Development and Diversity (10 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (9 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers). Nathan Choe is often cited by papers focused on Career Development and Diversity (10 papers), Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions (9 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (7 papers). Nathan Choe collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and South Korea. Nathan Choe's co-authors include Maura Borrego, David B. Knight, John J. Park, Diane L. Schallert, Luis L. Martins, Kevin Nguyen, Phoebe Long, Julie P. Martin, Jeffrey E. Froyd and Anita Patrick and has published in prestigious journals such as Sustainability, Journal of Research in Science Teaching and The Journal of Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Nathan Choe

21 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nathan Choe United States	11	127	96	76	69	33	21	268
Cassandra McCall United States	6	156 1.2×	113 1.2×	36 0.5×	82 1.2×	19 0.6×	21	374
Matilde Sánchez‐Peña United States	8	141 1.1×	99 1.0×	46 0.6×	65 0.9×	19 0.6×	29	352
Heather Perkins United States	9	150 1.2×	170 1.8×	70 0.9×	51 0.7×	22 0.7×	33	328
Rachel Kajfez United States	11	204 1.6×	102 1.1×	44 0.6×	128 1.9×	46 1.4×	79	450
Chanel Beebe United States	2	106 0.8×	80 0.8×	32 0.4×	52 0.8×	14 0.4×	4	250
Heidi Loshbaugh United States	9	132 1.0×	142 1.5×	36 0.5×	135 2.0×	23 0.7×	19	297
Anita Patrick United States	10	110 0.9×	156 1.6×	23 0.3×	107 1.6×	42 1.3×	19	270
David Reeping United States	9	112 0.9×	44 0.5×	20 0.3×	93 1.3×	40 1.2×	62	293
Robert Domingo United States	4	282 2.2×	50 0.5×	18 0.2×	47 0.7×	15 0.5×	6	389
Rebecca Campbell‐Montalvo United States	11	147 1.2×	118 1.2×	28 0.4×	20 0.3×	10 0.3×	29	283

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Choe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Choe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Choe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Choe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Choe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Choe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Choe. The network helps show where Nathan Choe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Choe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Choe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Choe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Choe. Nathan Choe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Park, John J., et al.. (2022). Understanding Students’ Perception of Sustainability: Educational NLP in the Analysis of Free Answers. Sustainability. 14(21). 13970–13970. 2 indexed citations

Knight, David B., et al.. (2020). A Competitive System: Graduate Student Recruitment in STEM and Why Money May Not be the Answer. The Journal of Higher Education. 91(6). 927–952. 14 indexed citations

Choe, Nathan, et al.. (2020). Engineering Identity Development of Hispanic Students. 6 indexed citations

Choe, Nathan, et al.. (2020). Comparison of Job Market and Employer Interest in Undergraduate Engineering Students: An Exploratory Analysis. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 2 indexed citations

Choe, Nathan, et al.. (2020). Optimal Sequencing of Graduate Funding in a Chemical Engineering Department: Maximizing Completion and Persistence Rates. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 1 indexed citations

Choe, Nathan, et al.. (2020). Predictors of Engineering Doctoral Students' Future Career Sector. 3 indexed citations

Choe, Nathan & Maura Borrego. (2020). Master's and doctoral engineering students' interest in industry, academia, and government careers. Journal of Engineering Education. 109(2). 325–346. 32 indexed citations

Borrego, Maura, Nathan Choe, Kevin Nguyen, & David B. Knight. (2019). STEM doctoral student agency regarding funding. Studies in Higher Education. 46(4). 737–749. 23 indexed citations

Choe, Nathan, et al.. (2019). Factors Influencing Engineering Identity Development of Latinx Students. IEEE Transactions on Education. 62(3). 173–180. 21 indexed citations

10.

Choe, Nathan & Maura Borrego. (2019). Prediction of Engineering Identity in Engineering Graduate Students. IEEE Transactions on Education. 62(3). 181–187. 24 indexed citations

11.

Park, John J., et al.. (2019). When groups experience conflict: intersection among undergraduates’ individual and group motivational goals, project commitment, and emotions. Educational Psychology. 39(9). 1156–1173. 3 indexed citations

12.

Choe, Nathan, et al.. (2019). Professional Aspects of Engineering: Improving Prediction of Undergraduates’ Engineering Identity. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 145(3). 18 indexed citations

13.

Choe, Nathan, Maura Borrego, Luis L. Martins, Anita Patrick, & Carolyn Conner Seepersad. (2018). A Quantitative Pilot Study of Engineering Graduate Student Identity. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 11 indexed citations

14.

Froyd, Jeffrey E., et al.. (2018). Board # 153 : A Systematic Review of Literature on Latino Transfer Students in Engineering. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 1 indexed citations

15.

Martin, Julie P., et al.. (2018). Interventions supporting baccalaureate achievement of Latinx STEM students matriculating at 2‐year institutions: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 56(4). 440–464. 26 indexed citations

16.

Knight, David B., et al.. (2018). Doctoral student funding portfolios across and within engineering, life sciences and physical sciences. 9(1). 75–90. 19 indexed citations

17.

Patrick, Anita, et al.. (2018). A Measure of Affect toward Key Elements of Engineering Professional Practice. 10 indexed citations

18.

Park, John J., Phoebe Long, Nathan Choe, & Diane L. Schallert. (2018). The contribution of self-compassion and compassion to others to students’ emotions and project commitment when experiencing conflict in group projects. International Journal of Educational Research. 88. 20–30. 20 indexed citations

19.

Borrego, Maura, David B. Knight, & Nathan Choe. (2017). Research group experiences and intent to complete. 8(2). 109–127. 5 indexed citations

20.

Park, John J., et al.. (2017). The chemical engineering research laboratory as context for graduate students' training: The role of lab structure and cultural climate in collaborative work. Learning Culture and Social Interaction. 13. 113–122. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact