Christopher M. Berry

4.7k total citations · 3 hit papers
52 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Christopher M. Berry is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Christopher M. Berry has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 15 papers in Clinical Psychology and 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Christopher M. Berry's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (13 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers). Christopher M. Berry is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (17 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (13 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers). Christopher M. Berry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Germany. Christopher M. Berry's co-authors include Paul R. Sackett, Deniz S. Öneş, Nichelle C. Carpenter, Clare L. Barratt, Lawrence Houston, Malissa A. Clark, Filip Lievens, Charlene Zhang, Roxanne M. Laczo and Robert Short and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.

In The Last Decade

Christopher M. Berry

51 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis.

2007 964 citations Christopher M. Berry, Deniz S. Öneş et al. Journal of Applied Psychology profile →
Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison.

2011 510 citations Christopher M. Berry, Clare L. Barratt et al. Journal of Applied Psychology profile →
Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range.

2021 140 citations Paul R. Sackett, Charlene Zhang et al. Journal of Applied Psychology profile →

Peers

Christopher M. Berry

OBHRM

SPS

ISM

Huiwen Lian United States

Jason J. Dahling United States

Joel Koopman United States

Lisa M. Penney United States

Richard D. Goffin Canada

Bradley P. Owens United States

Frank D. Belschak Netherlands

John P. Trougakos Canada

Hannes Leroy Netherlands

Lauren Simon United States

Huiwen Lian United States

Christopher M. Berry

1.8k ×1.0

OBHRM

1.6k ×1.3

1.2k ×1.1

SPS

645 ×0.6

248 ×0.7

ISM

Citations per year, relative to Christopher M. Berry Christopher M. Berry (= 1×) peers Huiwen Lian

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher M. Berry

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher M. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher M. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher M. Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher M. Berry

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher M. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher M. Berry. The network helps show where Christopher M. Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher M. Berry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher M. Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher M. Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher M. Berry. Christopher M. Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sackett, Paul R., Christopher M. Berry, Filip Lievens, & Charlene Zhang. (2025). Issues in Contrasting Conservative and Considered Estimation: A Reply to Bobko et al. (2024). International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 33(3). 1 indexed citations

Berry, Christopher M., et al.. (2024). Eye of the beholder: A meta-analysis of personality traits' relationships with psychological contract breach and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 155. 104064–104064.

Berry, Christopher M., Filip Lievens, Charlene Zhang, & Paul R. Sackett. (2024). Insights from an updated personnel selection meta-analytic matrix: Revisiting general mental ability tests’ role in the validity–diversity trade-off.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 109(10). 1611–1634. 6 indexed citations

Berry, Christopher M.. (2024). Personnel selection systems and diversity. Current Opinion in Psychology. 60. 101905–101905. 2 indexed citations

Sackett, Paul R., Charlene Zhang, Christopher M. Berry, & Filip Lievens. (2023). Revisiting the design of selection systems in light of new findings regarding the validity of widely used predictors. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 16(3). 283–300. 12 indexed citations

Sackett, Paul R., Christopher M. Berry, Filip Lievens, & Charlene Zhang. (2023). Correcting for range restriction in meta-analysis: A reply to Oh et al. (2023).. Journal of Applied Psychology. 108(8). 1311–1315. 8 indexed citations

Steele, Logan M., Rebecca Rees, & Christopher M. Berry. (2023). The role of self-interest in unethical pro-organizational behavior: A nomological network meta-analysis.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 109(3). 362–385. 12 indexed citations

Berry, Christopher M.. (2022). A critical examination and meta-analysis of the distinction between the dominance and antiegalitarianism facets of social dominance orientation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 124(2). 413–436. 11 indexed citations

Sackett, Paul R., Charlene Zhang, Christopher M. Berry, & Filip Lievens. (2021). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 107(11). 2040–2068. 140 indexed citations breakdown →

10.

Walter, Sheryl L., Erik Gonzalez‐Mulé, Cristiano L. Guarana, et al.. (2020). The race discipline gap: A cautionary note on archival measures of behavioral misconduct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 166. 166–178. 6 indexed citations

11.

Berry, Christopher M., et al.. (2019). Revisiting predictive bias of cognitive ability tests against Hispanic American job applicants. Personnel Psychology. 73(3). 517–542. 2 indexed citations

12.

Berry, Christopher M., et al.. (2019). The importance of being humble: A meta-analysis and incremental validity analysis of the relationship between honesty-humility and job performance.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 104(12). 1535–1546. 81 indexed citations

13.

Beatty, Adam, Clare L. Barratt, Christopher M. Berry, & Paul R. Sackett. (2014). Testing the generalizability of indirect range restriction corrections.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 99(4). 587–598. 13 indexed citations

14.

Berry, Christopher M., et al.. (2014). Addressing criticisms of existing predictive bias research: Cognitive ability test scores still overpredict African Americans’ job performance.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 100(1). 162–179. 19 indexed citations

15.

Berry, Christopher M., et al.. (2011). Racial/ethnic differences in the criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: A qualitative and quantitative review.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 96(5). 881–906. 60 indexed citations

16.

Chiaburu, Dan S., In‐Sue Oh, Christopher M. Berry, Ning Li, & Richard G. Gardner. (2011). The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 96(6). 1140–1166. 43 indexed citations

17.

Berry, Christopher M., Deniz S. Öneş, & Paul R. Sackett. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 92(2). 410–424. 964 indexed citations breakdown →

18.

Berry, Christopher M., Melissa L. Gruys, & Paul R. Sackett. (2006). Educational attainment as a proxy for cognitive ability in selection: Effects on levels of cognitive ability and adverse impact.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91(3). 696–705. 48 indexed citations

19.

McDonell, Michael G., Robert Short, Christopher M. Berry, & Dennis G. Dyck. (2003). Burden in Schizophrenia Caregivers: Impact of Family Psychoeducation and Awareness of Patient Suicidality. Family Process. 42(1). 91–103. 120 indexed citations

20.

Hazel, Nicholas A., Michael G. McDonell, Robert Short, et al.. (2003). Impact of Multiple-Family Groups for Outpatients With Schizophrenia on Caregivers' Distress and Resources. Psychiatric Services. 55(1). 35–41. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact