Annet C. Hoek
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Ecology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Marketing top 2%
- Co-authors
- Pieternel A. LuningCees de GraafFrans J. KokJohanna E. ElzermanWim EngelsP.L.G. WeijzenDavid PearsonMark Lawrence
- Topics
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers)Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (7 papers)Sodium Intake and Health (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Environmental ManagementFood Research InternationalResources Conservation and Recycling
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Annet C. Hoek
30 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Food Science 1.4k
- Ecology 1.0k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 507
- Plant Science 506
- Marketing 459
Countries citing papers authored by Annet C. Hoek
This map shows the geographic impact of Annet C. Hoek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annet C. Hoek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annet C. Hoek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annet C. Hoek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annet C. Hoek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annet C. Hoek. The network helps show where Annet C. Hoek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annet C. Hoek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annet C. Hoek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annet C. Hoek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annet C. Hoek. Annet C. Hoek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 125 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 99 | |
| 14 | 258 | |
| 15 | Feeling the flavour: the wine industry gets emotional | 1 |
| 16 | Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptancebreakdown → | 543 |
| 17 | 226 | |
| 18 | 231 | |
| 19 | 101 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Annet C. Hoek
Annet C. Hoek is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Sensory Systems and Food Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (7 papers) and Sodium Intake and Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (1.4k citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (98 citations) and Marketing (459 citations). Annet C. Hoek has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pieternel A. Luning, Cees de Graaf, Frans J. Kok, Johanna E. Elzerman, Wim Engels, P.L.G. Weijzen, David Pearson, Mark Lawrence, Sharon Friel and Stephen W. James. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Food Research International and Resources Conservation and Recycling.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.