Thomas K. Kelemen

21 papers receiving 518 citations

Hit Papers

Humble leadership: A review and synthesis of leader expre...202220262023202420222023255075

Peers

Thomas K. Kelemen
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 285
  • Social Psychology 174
  • Sociology and Political Science 141
  • Demography 71
  • General Health Professions 56
Replace Samuel H. Matthews with:
Samuel H. Matthews United States
Kai C. Bormann Germany
Yang Sui China
Chantal Olckers South Africa
Tyler Burch United States
Yue Xu China
Ismael Diaz United States
Jee Young Seong South Korea
Carol Flinchbaugh United States
Mark Gavin United States
Thomas K. Kelemen relative to Samuel H. Matthews United States Samuel H. Matthews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Samuel H. Matthews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas K. Kelemen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas K. Kelemen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas K. Kelemen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas K. Kelemen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas K. Kelemen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas K. Kelemen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas K. Kelemen. The network helps show where Thomas K. Kelemen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas K. Kelemen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas K. Kelemen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas K. Kelemen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas K. Kelemen. Thomas K. Kelemen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 8
5 2
6 7
7
Instrumental variables estimation: Assumptions, pitfalls, and guidelinesbreakdown →
72
8 4
9 10
10 2
11 23
12 9
13 48
14 29
15 58
16 21
17 32
18 102
19 2
20 2

About Thomas K. Kelemen

Thomas K. Kelemen is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Business and International Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (285 citations), Social Psychology (174 citations) and Applied Psychology (37 citations). Thomas K. Kelemen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Samuel H. Matthews, Michael Matthews, Mark C. Bolino, Kimberley Breevaart, Nicolas Bastardoz, Gwendolin B. Sajons, Tyler Ransom, Yejun Zhang, Min Wan and Ryan S. Bisel. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Management and Journal of Organizational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026