Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context
2003531 citationsAlex Kozulin, Alex Kozulin et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Suzanne M. Miller
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Suzanne M. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Suzanne M. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Suzanne M. Miller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Suzanne M. Miller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Suzanne M. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Suzanne M. Miller. The network helps show where Suzanne M. Miller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Suzanne M. Miller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Suzanne M. Miller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Suzanne M. Miller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Suzanne M. Miller. Suzanne M. Miller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Miller, Suzanne M. & David L. Bruce. (2017). Welcome to the 21st Century: New Literacies Stances to Support Student Learning with Digital Video Composing. The English Journal. 106(3). 14.2 indexed citations
Nikolaev, Alexander, et al.. (2017). CROWDLEARNING. 221–224.16 indexed citations
4.
Liu, Xiangrong, et al.. (2015). Research-Informed Practice, Practice-Informed Research: The Integral Role of Undergraduate Research in Professional Disciplines at BSU.3 indexed citations
Miller, Suzanne M.. (2010). Reframing Multimodal Composing for Student Learning: Lessons on Purpose from the Buffalo DV Project. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 10(2). 197–219.21 indexed citations
Kozulin, Alex, Alex Kozulin, Roy Pea, et al.. (2003). Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Cambridge University Press eBooks.531 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Miller, Suzanne M., et al.. (2003). Technology Use as a Catalyst for Change: A Leadership Framework for Transforming Urban Teacher Preparation, 7(12). 7.3 indexed citations
Miller, Suzanne M., et al.. (1997). Multicultural Dialogue in Literature-History Classes: The Dance of Creative and Critical Thinking. Report Series 7.9..2 indexed citations
17.
Miller, Suzanne M.. (1996). Making the Paths: Constructing Multicultural Texts and Critical-Narrative Discourse in Literature-History Classes. Report Series 7.8..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.