Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Relationships among school climate, school safety, and student achievement and well‐being: a review of the literature
Countries citing papers authored by Don A. Klinger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Don A. Klinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don A. Klinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don A. Klinger more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don A. Klinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don A. Klinger. The network helps show where Don A. Klinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Don A. Klinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Don A. Klinger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Don A. Klinger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Don A. Klinger. Don A. Klinger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Volante, Louis, et al.. (2020). The Use of a Multidimensional Support Model to Examine Policies and Practices for Immigrant Students across Canada. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation. 43(1). 121–169.3 indexed citations
3.
Klinger, Don A., et al.. (2020). The Enactment of Applied English: Does Caring Lead to Teaching to the Test?.. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation. 43(3). 803–828.1 indexed citations
Klinger, Don A., et al.. (2018). Assessing and Reporting Non-Cognitive Skills: A Cross-Canada Survey. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy.4 indexed citations
Volante, Louis, Don A. Klinger, Özge Bilgili, & Melissa Siegel. (2017). Making Sense of the Performance (Dis)advantage for Immigrant Students Across Canada. Research Publications (Maastricht University). 40(3). 329–361.11 indexed citations
Doe, Christine, Liying Cheng, Janna Fox, Don A. Klinger, & Ying Zheng. (2011). What Has Experience Got to Do with It? An Exploration of L1 and L2 Test Takers' Perceptions of Test Performance and Alignment to Classroom Literacy Activities.. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation. 34(3). 68–85.4 indexed citations
14.
Cheng, Liying, Don A. Klinger, & Ying Zheng. (2009). Examining Students' After-School Literacy Activities and Their Literacy Performance on the Ontario Secondary School Literacy Test. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation. 32(1). 118–148.13 indexed citations
Klinger, Don A.. (2008). The Evolving Culture of Large-Scale Assessments in Canadian Education.. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. 1–34.63 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.