Sue Sentance

2.7k citations
73 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Sue Sentance

69 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Sue Sentance
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Computer Science Applications 1.2k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 480
  • Gender Studies 248
  • Media Technology 203
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 51
Replace Barbara Ericson with:
Barbara Ericson United States
Colleen M. Lewis United States
Carsten Schulte Germany
Kristy Elizabeth Boyer United States
Carol Zander United States
Leo Porter United States
Renée McCauley United States
David Weintrop United States
Briana B. Morrison United States
Irene Lee United States
Sue Sentance relative to Barbara Ericson United States Barbara Ericson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Barbara Ericson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sue Sentance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sue Sentance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sue Sentance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sue Sentance more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sue Sentance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sue Sentance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sue Sentance. The network helps show where Sue Sentance may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sue Sentance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sue Sentance Line = papers co-authored together Sue Sentance links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20241
4 20241
5 20240
6 20241
7 20230
8 202216
9 20225
10 20204
11 20195
12 20187
13 201824
14 201745
15 201779
16
Teachers’ perspectives on successful strategies for teaching Computing in school
201524
17 201429
18 201367
19
Changes afoot in the UK
20121
20 201228

About Sue Sentance

Sue Sentance is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Gender Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Software, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (64 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (19 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (18 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (14 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (14 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (8 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (1.2k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (480 citations), Gender Studies (248 citations), Media Technology (203 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (51 citations). Sue Sentance has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Csizmadia, Jane Waite, Tom Crick, Simon Humphreys, Neil C. C. Brown, Maria Kallia, Steve Hodges, Lucy Yeomans, Emily MacLeod and Valentina Dagienė. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Education and Information Technologies, Computer Science Education, Human-Computer Interaction and Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026