Jane Waite

913 total citations
32 papers, 457 citations indexed

About

Jane Waite is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Waite has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 457 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Computer Science Applications, 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 7 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Jane Waite's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (29 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (12 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (7 papers). Jane Waite is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (29 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (12 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (7 papers). Jane Waite collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Jane Waite's co-authors include Sue Sentance, Emily MacLeod, Lucy Yeomans, Maria Kallia, Paul Curzon, Steve Hodges, William Marsh, Andrew Csizmadia, Karl Maton and Briana B. Morrison and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Education, Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science Education.

In The Last Decade

Jane Waite

30 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Jane Waite
Ralf Romeike Germany
Jason Zagami Australia
Amy Eguchi United States
Benjamin Xie United States
Veronica Cateté United States
Marina Umashi Bers United States
Kathryn M. Rich United States
Ira Diethelm Germany
Morgane Chevalier Switzerland
Ralf Romeike Germany
Jane Waite
Citations per year, relative to Jane Waite Jane Waite (= 1×) peers Ralf Romeike

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Waite

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Waite's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Waite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Waite more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Waite

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Waite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Waite. The network helps show where Jane Waite may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Waite

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Waite. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Waite based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Waite. Jane Waite is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schulte, Carsten, Sue Sentance, Matti Tedre, et al.. (2025). What We Talk About When We Talk About K-12 Computing Education. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 226–257. 1 indexed citations
2.
Schulte, Carsten, Sue Sentance, Matti Tedre, et al.. (2024). Values and Beliefs Underpinning K-12 Computing Education. 767–768. 1 indexed citations
3.
Sentance, Sue, et al.. (2024). Developing Computing Teacher Guidance on GenAI. 1–1. 1 indexed citations
6.
Waite, Jane, et al.. (2023). Artificial Intelligence teaching and learning in K-12 from 2019 to 2022: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence. 4. 100145–100145. 62 indexed citations
9.
Waite, Jane, et al.. (2022). Teachers' Motivations to Learn about ML and AI. 609–609. 2 indexed citations
10.
Morrison, Briana B., Beth Quinn, Steven Bradley, et al.. (2021). Chronicling the Evidence for Broadening Participation. 601–602. 1 indexed citations
11.
Sentance, Sue & Jane Waite. (2021). Teachers’ Perspectives on Talk in the Programming Classroom : Language as a Mediator. 266–280. 6 indexed citations
12.
Morrison, Briana B., Beth Quinn, Steven Bradley, et al.. (2021). Evidence for Teaching Practices that Broaden Participation for Women in Computing. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 57–131. 30 indexed citations
13.
Waite, Jane, et al.. (2021). Computer Science Student-Centered Instructional Continuum. Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London). 1246–1246. 1 indexed citations
14.
Csizmadia, Andrew, et al.. (2019). Integrating the Constructionist Learning Theory with Computational Thinking Classroom Activities. Informatics in Education. 18(1). 41–67. 28 indexed citations
15.
Waite, Jane, et al.. (2019). Unplugged Computing and Semantic Waves. Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London). 1–7. 14 indexed citations
16.
Sentance, Sue, Jane Waite, & Maria Kallia. (2019). Teachers' Experiences of using PRIMM to Teach Programming in School. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 476–482. 20 indexed citations
17.
Sentance, Sue & Jane Waite. (2018). Computing in the classroom: Tales from the chalkface. it - Information Technology. 60(2). 103–112. 7 indexed citations
18.
Sentance, Sue, Jane Waite, Lucy Yeomans, & Emily MacLeod. (2017). Teaching with physical computing devices. Research Portal (King's College London). 87–96. 45 indexed citations
19.
Sentance, Sue, Jane Waite, Steve Hodges, Emily MacLeod, & Lucy Yeomans. (2017). "Creating Cool Stuff". Research Portal (King's College London). 531–536. 79 indexed citations
20.
Waite, Jane, Paul Curzon, William Marsh, & Sue Sentance. (2016). Abstraction and common classroom activities. Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London). 112–113. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026