Leo Porter

3.5k citations
107 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Leo Porter

96 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Leo Porter
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Computer Science Applications 1.5k
  • Media Technology 539
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 607
  • Education 739
  • Hardware and Architecture 139
Replace Daniel Zingaro with:
Daniel Zingaro Canada
Linda Mannila Sweden
Sue Sentance United Kingdom
Anna Eckerdal Sweden
Shuchi Grover United States
Carol Zander United States
Michael E. Caspersen Denmark
Jens Bennedsen Denmark
John Hamer New Zealand
Yifat Ben‐David Kolikant Israel
Leo Porter relative to Daniel Zingaro Canada Daniel Zingaro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Daniel Zingaro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leo Porter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leo Porter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo Porter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo Porter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leo Porter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo Porter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo Porter. The network helps show where Leo Porter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leo Porter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leo Porter Line = papers co-authored together Leo Porter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 202510
3 20252
4 20253
5 20250
6 20250
7 20250
8 20250
9 20242
10 202410
11 20246
12 20242
13 202432
14 20242
15 20236
16 20221
17 201967
18
Peer instruction in CS: research and experience
20131
19
Peer instruction in the CS classroom: a hands-on introduction: conference tutorial
20111
20 200813

About Leo Porter

Leo Porter is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Media Technology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (66 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (40 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (39 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (33 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (14 papers), Online and Blended Learning (11 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (8 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (1.5k citations), Media Technology (539 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (607 citations), Education (739 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (139 citations). Leo Porter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Zingaro, Beth Simon, Cynthia Bailey Lee, William G. Griswold, Christine Alvarado, Soohyun Nam Liao, Dean M. Tullsen, Cynthia Taylor, Kevin C. Webb and Cynthia Lee. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Communications of the ACM, Computer Science Education, ACM SIGPLAN Notices and Computers & Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026