Countries where authors publish in Computer Science Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Science Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Science Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Science Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Computer Science Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Science Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Science Education.
About Computer Science Education
The 608 papers published in Computer Science Education in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Computer Science Education usually cover Computer Science Applications (398 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (197 papers) and Software (56 papers) specifically the topics of Teaching and Learning Programming (363 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (125 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (87 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (86 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (84 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (75 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (73 papers) and Software Engineering Research (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Science Education are Anthony Robins, Nathan Rountree, Janet Rountree, Kirsti Ala-Mutka, James E. Tomayko, Laurie Williams, Sylvia Beyer, Mordechai Ben‐Ari, Brenda Cantwell Wilson and Beth Simon.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.