Computer Science Education

596 papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 596 papers published in Computer Science Education in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Computer Science Education usually cover Computer Science Applications (389 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (194 papers) and Information Systems (164 papers) specifically the topics of Teaching and Learning Programming (353 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (124 papers) and Online Learning and Analytics (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Science Education are Anthony Robins, Janet Rountree, Nathan Rountree, James E. Tomayko, Kirsti Ala-Mutka, Laurie Williams, Sylvia Beyer, Mordechai Ben‐Ari, Brenda Cantwell Wilson and Andrew Luxton-Reilly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Computer Science Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Science Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Science Education.

Countries where authors publish in Computer Science Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Science Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Science Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Science Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025