Barbara Ericson

2.5k citations
87 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Barbara Ericson

81 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Barbara Ericson
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Computer Science Applications 1.1k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 463
  • Gender Studies 245
  • Media Technology 187
  • Software 79
Replace Sue Sentance with:
Sue Sentance United Kingdom
Amber Settle United States
Joyce Malyn‐Smith United States
Michelle Craig Canada
Irene Lee United States
Leo Porter United States
Linda Mannila Sweden
Andrew Petersen Canada
Renée McCauley United States
Carol Zander United States
Barbara Ericson relative to Sue Sentance United Kingdom Sue Sentance's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sue Sentance · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Ericson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Ericson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Ericson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Ericson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Ericson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Ericson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Ericson. The network helps show where Barbara Ericson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Ericson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara Ericson Line = papers co-authored together Barbara Ericson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20240
4 20233
5 20230
6 20236
7 202231
8 20224
9 20204
10 201922
11 201851
12 201614
13 20152
14 201438
15
Performance and Use Evaluation of an Electronic Book for Introductory Python Programming
20129
16
Introduction to computing & programming in Python : amultimedia approach
20109
17 200924
18 20071
19 200515
20 200514

About Barbara Ericson

Barbara Ericson is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Media Technology, Gender Studies and Software, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (64 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (33 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (18 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (11 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (11 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (10 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (8 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (1.1k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (463 citations), Gender Studies (245 citations), Media Technology (187 citations) and Software (79 citations). Barbara Ericson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark Guzdial, Tom McKlin, Briana B. Morrison, Lauren E. Margulieux, Jochen Rick, Maureen Biggers, Kathryn Cunningham, Xinying Hou, James D. Foley and Miranda C. Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, ACM Inroads, Policy Futures in Education and ICLS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026