Software

93.6k papers and 1.2M indexed citations i.

About

93.6k papers covering Software have received a total of 1.2M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques and Software Engineering Research and also cover the fields of Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. Some of the most active scholars covering Software are Barry Boehm, Mark Harman, David Harel, Robert G. Sargent, Lionel Briand, Gerard J. Holzmann, Elaine J. Weyuker, Hoang Pham, Gregory Levitin and Victor R. Basili.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Software

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Software. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Software.

Countries where authors publish papers about Software

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Software. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Software with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025