Michael O’Mahony
- Food Science top 0.2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 0.5%
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Benoı̂t RousseauRie IshiiOfelia AnguloJ.-M. DessirierKWANG‐OK KIMSukanya WichchukitHye-Seong LeeMirela Iodi Carstens
- Topics
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (65 papers)Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (51 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (32 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaMexico
In The Last Decade
Michael O’Mahony
88 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Food Science 1.6k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 1.1k
- Sensory Systems 615
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 566
- Plant Science 327
Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Mahony
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Mahony's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Mahony with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Mahony more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Mahony
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Mahony. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Mahony. The network helps show where Michael O’Mahony may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael O’Mahony
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael O’Mahony. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael O’Mahony based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael O’Mahony. Michael O’Mahony is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | LAS PRUEBAS DE PREFERENCIA EN ALIMENTOS SON MÁS COMPLEJAS DE LO IMAGINADO | 1 |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | Sensory Difference Testing | 54 |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Michael O’Mahony
Michael O’Mahony is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Food Science and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (65 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (51 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (615 citations), Food Science (1.6k citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (1.1k citations). Michael O’Mahony has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Benoı̂t Rousseau, Rie Ishii, Ofelia Angulo, J.-M. Dessirier, KWANG‐OK KIM, Sukanya Wichchukit, Hye-Seong Lee, Mirela Iodi Carstens, E. Carstens and Mark A. Matthews. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Cancer and Trends in Food Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.