Séamus Fanning
- Food Science top 0.02%
- Endocrinology top 0.02%
- Infectious Diseases top 0.2%
- Molecular Medicine top 0.05%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Paul WhyteCarol IversenRoger StephanMarta MartinsPatrick WallNiamh MullaneTeresa QuinnDenise Drudy
- Topics
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (142 papers)Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (102 papers)Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (84 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEAnalytical Chemistry
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Séamus Fanning
436 papers receiving 14.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Food Science 5.8k
- Endocrinology 4.8k
- Infectious Diseases 3.5k
- Molecular Medicine 3.0k
- Molecular Biology 3.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Séamus Fanning
This map shows the geographic impact of Séamus Fanning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Séamus Fanning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Séamus Fanning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Séamus Fanning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Séamus Fanning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Séamus Fanning. The network helps show where Séamus Fanning may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Séamus Fanning
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Séamus Fanning. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Séamus Fanning based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Séamus Fanning. Séamus Fanning is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 108 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | Assessment and comparison of efflux pumps of cancer cells and MDR bacteria under physiological conditions by a real-time semi-automated system | 1 |
About Séamus Fanning
Séamus Fanning is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Molecular Medicine and Food Science, having authored 446 papers that have together received 15.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (142 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (102 papers) and Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (84 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (4.8k citations), Molecular Medicine (3.0k citations) and Food Science (5.8k citations). Séamus Fanning has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Paul Whyte, Carol Iversen, Roger Stephan, Marta Martins, Patrick Wall, Niamh Mullane, Teresa Quinn, Denise Drudy, Angelika Lehner and C.T. Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.