Michael O’Mahony

4.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
107 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Michael O’Mahony is a scholar working on Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael O’Mahony has authored 107 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 72 papers in Food Science, 52 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 24 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Michael O’Mahony's work include Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (68 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (47 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (24 papers). Michael O’Mahony is often cited by papers focused on Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (68 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (47 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (24 papers). Michael O’Mahony collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Michael O’Mahony's co-authors include Sukanya Wichchukit, Daniel M. Ennis, Jian Bi, Rie Ishii, KWANG‐OK KIM, Benoı̂t Rousseau, E. Carstens, Ofelia Angulo, Jeannine Delwiche and Gonca Pasin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Food Chemistry and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Michael O’Mahony

105 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Sensory Evaluation of Food: Statistical Methods and Proce... 1986 2026 1999 2012 1986 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael O’Mahony United States 35 2.5k 1.9k 912 692 559 107 3.6k
Joanne Hort United Kingdom 36 2.5k 1.0× 1.6k 0.8× 946 1.0× 395 0.6× 512 0.9× 113 3.5k
Michael O’Mahony United States 28 1.6k 0.7× 1.1k 0.6× 615 0.7× 566 0.8× 246 0.4× 90 2.3k
Zata Vickers United States 40 1.9k 0.8× 1.5k 0.8× 557 0.6× 474 0.7× 595 1.1× 135 3.9k
Pascal Schlich France 40 4.1k 1.6× 2.2k 1.2× 1.1k 1.2× 935 1.4× 714 1.3× 154 5.2k
Jean‐Xavier Guinard United States 38 2.6k 1.0× 1.5k 0.8× 824 0.9× 307 0.4× 452 0.8× 111 4.2k
Dominique Valentin France 44 3.2k 1.3× 1.1k 0.6× 957 1.0× 1.0k 1.5× 403 0.7× 147 5.6k
Rose Marie Pangborn United States 40 2.4k 1.0× 2.2k 1.2× 1.4k 1.5× 397 0.6× 677 1.2× 116 4.7k
Erminio Monteleone Italy 41 2.9k 1.2× 1.5k 0.8× 1.1k 1.2× 393 0.6× 594 1.1× 143 4.7k
H.J.H. MacFie United Kingdom 30 1.6k 0.7× 650 0.3× 417 0.5× 345 0.5× 717 1.3× 54 3.6k
B. Thomas Carr Australia 23 3.4k 1.4× 2.0k 1.1× 560 0.6× 499 0.7× 1.5k 2.6× 35 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Mahony

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Mahony's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Mahony with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Mahony more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Mahony

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Mahony. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Mahony. The network helps show where Michael O’Mahony may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael O’Mahony

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael O’Mahony. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael O’Mahony based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael O’Mahony. Michael O’Mahony is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wichchukit, Sukanya & Michael O’Mahony. (2022). The 9-point hedonic and unstructured line hedonic scales: An alternative analysis with more relevant effect sizes for preference. Food Quality and Preference. 99. 104575–104575. 10 indexed citations
2.
Morris, Nicholas J., et al.. (2020). Noise, vibration and harshness during dry clutch engagement oscillations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 234(23). 4572–4588. 2 indexed citations
3.
Xia, Yixun, et al.. (2020). The 9-point hedonic scale: Using R-Index Preference Measurement to compute effect size and eliminate artifactual ties. Food Research International. 133. 109140–109140. 14 indexed citations
4.
Xia, Yixun, et al.. (2020). Paired preference tests and placebo placement: 2. Unraveling the effects of stimulus variance. Food Research International. 136. 109447–109447.
5.
Chung, Seo‐Jin, et al.. (2018). A cross-cultural study of acceptability and food pairing for hot sauces. Appetite. 123. 306–316. 28 indexed citations
6.
O’Mahony, Michael, et al.. (2018). The beta‐binomial: A preliminary comparison of smaller samples having many replications versus larger samples having fewer replications. Journal of Sensory Studies. 34(1). 1 indexed citations
7.
Bi, Jian, et al.. (2013). Nonparametric Estimation of d′ and Its Variance for the ANot A with Reminder. Journal of Sensory Studies. 28(5). 381–386. 6 indexed citations
8.
Lee, Hye-Seong & Michael O’Mahony. (2006). Sensory Difference Testing: The Problem of Overdispersion and the Use of Beta Binomial Statistical Analysis. Food Science and Biotechnology. 15(4). 494–498. 5 indexed citations
9.
O’Mahony, Michael, et al.. (2004). Sensory evaluation and marketing: measurement of a consumer concept. Food Quality and Preference. 16(3). 227–235. 46 indexed citations
10.
O’Mahony, Michael, et al.. (1998). Oral Irritant Effects of Nicotine: Psychophysical Evidence for Decreased Sensation following Repeated Application of and Lack of Cross‐Desensitization to Capsaicina. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 855(1). 828–830. 17 indexed citations
11.
Guinard, Jean‐Xavier, et al.. (1997). ELIMINATING ARTIFACTS IN THE STUDY OF SINGULARITY/MIXEDNESS OF TASTE STIMULI. Journal of Sensory Studies. 12(3). 181–193. 5 indexed citations
12.
Dessirier, J.-M., Michael O’Mahony, & E. Carstens. (1997). Oral Irritant Effects of Nicotine: Psychophysical Evidence for Decreased Sensation Following Repeated Application and Lack of Cross-desensitization to Capsaicin. Chemical Senses. 22(5). 483–492. 57 indexed citations
13.
Ennis, Daniel M. & Michael O’Mahony. (1995). Probabilistic models for sequential taste effects in triadic choice.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 21(5). 1088–1097. 37 indexed citations
14.
Ennis, Daniel M., et al.. (1994). Triadic discrimination testing: refinement of Thurstonian and Sequential Sensitivity Analysis approaches. Chemical Senses. 19(4). 279–301. 62 indexed citations
15.
O’Mahony, Michael. (1986). SENSORY ADAPTATION. Journal of Sensory Studies. 1(3-4). 237–258. 46 indexed citations
16.
O’Mahony, Michael, et al.. (1980). RATING AND RANKING PROCEDURES FOR SHORT‐CUT SIGNAL DETECTION MULTIPLE DIFFERENCE TESTS. Journal of Food Science. 45(2). 392–393. 31 indexed citations
17.
O’Mahony, Michael. (1979). Psychophysical Aspects of Sensory Analysis of Dairy Product: A Critique. Journal of Dairy Science. 62(12). 1954–1962. 17 indexed citations
18.
O’Mahony, Michael, et al.. (1977). A preliminary study of alternative taste languages using qualitative description of sodium chloride solutions: Malay versus English. British Journal of Psychology. 68(3). 275–278. 4 indexed citations
19.
O’Mahony, Michael, et al.. (1974). Pair Comparison and Ascending Series NaCl Thresholds: Criterion and Residual Effects. Perception. 3(2). 185–192. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026