Federico Casanova
Impact in
-
- NMR spectroscopy and applications
- Spectroscopy top 0.5%
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- NMR spectroscopy and applications 60
- Spectroscopy 41
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications 38
- Co-authors
- Bernhard BlümichJuan PerloErnesto DanieliAntônio Fernandes de CarvalhoNaaman Francisco Nogueira SilvaMohammad Amin MohammadifarStephan AppeltLuís Gustavo Lima Nascimento
In The Last Decade
Federico Casanova
130 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.1k
- Spectroscopy 1.5k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.6k
- Food Science 760
- Radiation 172
Countries citing papers authored by Federico Casanova
This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Casanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Casanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Casanova more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Casanova
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Casanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Casanova. The network helps show where Federico Casanova may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federico Casanova, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 79 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 107 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 98 |
About Federico Casanova
Federico Casanova is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Spectroscopy, Food Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Radiation, having authored 135 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include NMR spectroscopy and applications (60 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (41 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (38 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (38 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (15 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (10 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (10 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.1k citations), Spectroscopy (1.5k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.6k citations), Food Science (760 citations) and Radiation (172 citations). Federico Casanova has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Blümich, Juan Perlo, Ernesto Danieli, Antônio Fernandes de Carvalho, Naaman Francisco Nogueira Silva, Mohammad Amin Mohammadifar, Stephan Appelt, Luís Gustavo Lima Nascimento, Lucas Sales Queiroz and Ahmed Taha. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Food Chemistry, Foods, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Food Hydrocolloids.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.