Dina Van Dijk
Impact in
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 12
- Co-authors
- Ronit KarkAvraham N. KlugerDana R. VashdiTal Katz–NavonRussell E. JohnsonTzahit Simon‐TuvalMaya Siman‐TovTali Seger-Guttmann
- Journals
- Journal of Business and Psychology (2 papers)Applied Psychology (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Emotion (1 paper)Medical Education (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dina Van Dijk
23 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 650
- Applied Psychology 287
- Research and Theory 21
- Social Psychology 427
- Family Practice 36
Countries citing papers authored by Dina Van Dijk
This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Van Dijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Van Dijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Van Dijk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Van Dijk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Van Dijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Van Dijk. The network helps show where Dina Van Dijk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dina Van Dijk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 85 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 198 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 22 |
About Dina Van Dijk
Dina Van Dijk is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Research and Theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Decision Sciences and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (650 citations), Applied Psychology (287 citations), Research and Theory (21 citations), Social Psychology (427 citations) and Family Practice (36 citations). Dina Van Dijk has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ronit Kark, Avraham N. Kluger, Dana R. Vashdi, Tal Katz–Navon, Russell E. Johnson, Tzahit Simon‐Tuval, Maya Siman‐Tov, Tali Seger-Guttmann, Daniel Heller and Fadel K. Matta. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business and Psychology, Applied Psychology, BMJ Open, Emotion and Medical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.