Ines Meyer

1.3k citations
22 papers · 513 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Meyer

18 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

Ines Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Neurology 168
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 159
  • Neurology 38
  • Physiology 113
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 29
Replace Peng Huang with:
Peng Huang China
Cecily Jenkins United States
Jay C. Kwon South Korea
Masaaki Tagawa Japan
Dhamidhu Eratne Australia
Matthew A Rouse United Kingdom
Kristine Olson United States
Catherine Madison United States
Luiza Spiru Romania
Jingxia Dang China
Ines Meyer relative to Peng Huang China Peng Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Peng Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Meyer. The network helps show where Ines Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Ines Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007423
2 201228
3 202114
4 201914
5 20228
6 20244
7 20213
8 20223
9 20242
10 20202
11 20182
12 20172
13 20182
14 20121
15 20231
16 20181
17 20221
18 20181
19 20211
20 20250

About Ines Meyer

Ines Meyer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Social Representations and Identity (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (168 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (159 citations), Neurology (38 citations), Physiology (113 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (29 citations). Ines Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Clive Holmes, Raffaele Giubbini, Zuzana Walker, Alessandro Padovani, P. M. Kemp, Jacques Darcourt, Duccio Volterrani, Ian G. McKeith, Ubaldo Bonuccelli and John T. O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of Social Psychology, Journal of Organizational Behavior, The Lancet Neurology and Journal of Consumer Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact