Emotion
About
In The Last Decade
Emotion
2.4k papers receiving 131.0k citations
Fields of papers published in Emotion
This network shows the impact of papers published in Emotion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Emotion.
Countries where authors publish in Emotion
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Emotion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Emotion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emotion more than expected).
- Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. (2007)
- Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. (2001)
- Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder. (2010)
- Emotion and motivation II: Sex differences in picture processing. (2001)
- Emotions evoked by the sound of music: Characterization, classification, and measurement. (2008)
- Music-evoked nostalgia: Affect, memory, and personality. (2010)
- Odyssey's end: Lay conceptions of nostalgia reflect its original homeric meaning. (2011)
- A preliminary investigation of the effects of experimentally induced mindfulness on emotional responding to film clips. (2010)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.