David De Cremer

5.2k citations
78 papers · 3.9k indexed · 3 hit papers · h-index 33

David De Cremer

77 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

No perso...842001202620092017200400600

Peers

David De Cremer
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.7k
  • Social Psychology 1.5k
  • Information Systems and Management 505
  • Applied Psychology 336
  • General Decision Sciences 83
Replace D. Ramona Bobocel with:
D. Ramona Bobocel Canada
Francis J. Flynn United States
Kai Chi Yam Singapore
Stefan Thau United Kingdom
Marius van Dijke Netherlands
Yochi Cohen‐Charash United States
Daniel Heller Israel
David De Cremer Netherlands
Jessica B. Rodell United States
Kelly G. Shaver United States
David De Cremer relative to D. Ramona Bobocel Canada D. Ramona Bobocel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
D. Ramona Bobocel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David De Cremer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David De Cremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David De Cremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David De Cremer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David De Cremer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David De Cremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David De Cremer. The network helps show where David De Cremer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David De Cremer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David De Cremer Line = papers co-authored together David De Cremer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2
No person is an island: Unpacking the work and after-work consequences of interacting with artificial intelligence.breakdown →
202384
3 20223
4 20208
5 201851
6 201816
7 201735
8 201711
9 20178
10 201539
11 20132
12 20131
13 201253
14 201141
15 201076
16 201074
17 2009132
18 2005101
19 200436
20 200424

About David De Cremer

David De Cremer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 78 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (30 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (28 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (16 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (13 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (11 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.7k citations), Social Psychology (1.5k citations) and Information Systems and Management (505 citations). David De Cremer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Marius van Dijke, Daan van Knippenberg, Michael A. Hogg, Barbara van Knippenberg, Maarten A.S. Boksem, David M. Mayer, Alain Van Hiel, Mark van Vugt, Jeroen Stouten and Chris Reinders Folmer. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Review, PLoS ONE and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026