David De Cremer
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Safety Research top 0.1%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Mark van VugtEric van DijkTom R. TylerDirk JanssenConstantine SedikidesLaetitia B. MulderAlain Van HielJeroen Stouten
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (66 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (51 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (23 papers)
- Cited by
- Safety ResearchGeneral Decision SciencesOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of Applied PsychologyJournal of Management
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
David De Cremer
90 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Sociology and Political Science 2.8k
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Safety Research 1.5k
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.0k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 840
Countries citing papers authored by David De Cremer
This map shows the geographic impact of David De Cremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David De Cremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David De Cremer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David De Cremer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David De Cremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David De Cremer. The network helps show where David De Cremer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David De Cremer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David De Cremer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David De Cremer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David De Cremer. David De Cremer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 79 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 62 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 140 | |
| 16 | 67 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 174 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About David De Cremer
David De Cremer is a scholar working on Safety Research, Applied Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 91 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (66 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (51 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (1.5k citations), General Decision Sciences (197 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.0k citations). David De Cremer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Mark van Vugt, Eric van Dijk, Eric van Dijk, Tom R. Tyler, Dirk Janssen, Constantine Sedikides, Laetitia B. Mulder, Alain Van Hiel, Jeroen Stouten and Maarten A.S. Boksem. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.