Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Cameron Anderson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Cameron Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cameron Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cameron Anderson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cameron Anderson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cameron Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cameron Anderson. The network helps show where Cameron Anderson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cameron Anderson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cameron Anderson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cameron Anderson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cameron Anderson. Cameron Anderson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Anderson, Cameron, et al.. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature.. Psychological Bulletin. 141(3). 574–601.667 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Kennedy, Jessica A., Cameron Anderson, & Don A. Moore. (2013). When Overconfidence Is Revealed to Others: Testing the Status-Enhancement Theory of Overconfidence. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Cameron, Michael W. Kraus, Adam D. Galinsky, & Dacher Keltner. (2012). The Local-Ladder Effect. Psychological Science. 23(7). 764–771.385 indexed citations breakdown →
Anderson, Cameron, Sébastien Brion, Don A. Moore, & Jessica A. Kennedy. (2012). A status-enhancement account of overconfidence.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 103(4). 718–735.8 indexed citations
11.
Kennedy, Jessica A., Cameron Anderson, & Don A. Moore. (2011). Social Reactions to Overconfidence: Do the Costs of Overconfidence Outweigh the Benefits?. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
12.
Anderson, Cameron & Sébastien Brion. (2010). Overconfidence and the Attainment of Status in Groups. eScholarship (California Digital Library).3 indexed citations
13.
Kilduff, Gavin J. & Cameron Anderson. (2009). Status Disagreement: Consequences for Group Performance and Group Member Behavior. eScholarship (California Digital Library).2 indexed citations
Anderson, Cameron & Aiwa Shirako. (2007). The Origins of Reputation: Behavior, Visibility, and Personality. eScholarship (California Digital Library).5 indexed citations
Anderson, Cameron, Dacher Keltner, & Oliver P. John. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 84(5). 1054–1068.398 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.