Brett H. Neely
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Accounting top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey B. LovelaceAmanda P. CowenNathan J. HillerAparna JoshiDorothy M. GriffithsGerard GeorgeCynthia G. EmrichSamuel T. Hunter
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers)Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementGender StudiesManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Brett H. Neely
9 papers receiving 447 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 201
- Gender Studies 161
- Strategy and Management 120
- Accounting 112
- Sociology and Political Science 97
Countries citing papers authored by Brett H. Neely
This map shows the geographic impact of Brett H. Neely's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brett H. Neely with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brett H. Neely more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brett H. Neely
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brett H. Neely. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brett H. Neely. The network helps show where Brett H. Neely may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brett H. Neely
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brett H. Neely. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brett H. Neely based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brett H. Neely. Brett H. Neely is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Researchbreakdown → | 246 |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 140 | |
| 13 | 16 |
About Brett H. Neely
Brett H. Neely is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies and Public Administration, having authored 13 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (201 citations), Gender Studies (161 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (87 citations). Brett H. Neely has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey B. Lovelace, Amanda P. Cowen, Nathan J. Hiller, Aparna Joshi, Dorothy M. Griffiths, Gerard George, Cynthia G. Emrich, Samuel T. Hunter, Kayla B. Follmer and Kisha S. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology and American Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.