Amanda P. Cowen

1.7k citations
21 papers · 1.2k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Amanda P. Cowen

19 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Reco...246202020262022202450100150200

Peers

Amanda P. Cowen
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Accounting 749
  • Finance 411
  • Strategy and Management 352
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 237
  • General Decision Sciences 26
Replace Ján Zábojník with:
Ján Zábojník Canada
Sidney L. Barton United States
Mark Clatworthy United Kingdom
George C. Mueller United States
Terry L. Campbell United States
J. Daniel Zyung United States
Sandra Mortal United States
Ithai Stern United States
Richard J. Gentry United States
Kasper Meisner Nielsen Denmark
Amanda P. Cowen relative to Ján Zábojník Canada Ján Zábojník's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Ján Zábojník · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda P. Cowen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda P. Cowen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda P. Cowen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda P. Cowen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda P. Cowen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda P. Cowen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda P. Cowen. The network helps show where Amanda P. Cowen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Amanda P. Cowen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda P. Cowen Line = papers co-authored together Amanda P. Cowen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20240
3 20245
4 202256
5 20219
6
Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Researchbreakdown →
2020246
7 20208
8 201935
9 201926
10 201511
11 201340
12 201237
13 2011117
14 20102
15 201013
16 20095
17
How Effective Leaders Drive Results Through Networks
20092
18 2006424
19 20062
20 200351

About Amanda P. Cowen

Amanda P. Cowen is a scholar working on Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (749 citations), Finance (411 citations) and Strategy and Management (352 citations). Amanda P. Cowen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Paul M. Healy, Boris Groysberg, Jeremy J. Marcel, Jeffrey B. Lovelace, Nathan J. Hiller, Brett H. Neely, Nicole Votolato Montgomery, Gary A. Ballinger, Ingo Weller and Denis A. Grégoire. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Academy of Management Review and Academy of Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026