Miranda C. Parker
- Computer Science Applications top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark GuzdialBarbara EricsonBriana B. MorrisonKantwon RogersMark WarschauerLeigh Ann DeLyserColleen M. LewisDiana Franklin
- Topics
- Teaching and Learning Programming (30 papers)Online Learning and Analytics (15 papers)Gender and Technology in Education (13 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Chemical EducationACM Transactions on Computing EducationComputer Science Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Miranda C. Parker
37 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Computer Science Applications 284
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 104
- Education 74
- Gender Studies 68
- Information Systems 64
Countries citing papers authored by Miranda C. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Miranda C. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miranda C. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miranda C. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Miranda C. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miranda C. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miranda C. Parker. The network helps show where Miranda C. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Miranda C. Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Miranda C. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Miranda C. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Miranda C. Parker. Miranda C. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | What makes big-O analysis difficult: understanding how students understand runtime analysis | 7 |
About Miranda C. Parker
Miranda C. Parker is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Gender Studies and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (30 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (15 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (284 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (104 citations) and Gender Studies (68 citations). Miranda C. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark Guzdial, Barbara Ericson, Briana B. Morrison, Kantwon Rogers, Mark Warschauer, Leigh Ann DeLyser, Colleen M. Lewis, Diana Franklin, Allison Elliott Tew and Beth Quinn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Education, ACM Transactions on Computing Education and Computer Science Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.