Anna T. Cianciolo
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Family Practice top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Phillip L. AckermanRobert J. SternbergGlenn RegehrDebra L. KlamenReed G. WilliamsOlle ten CateNicole K. RobertsAsja Maaz
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (39 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (12 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Family PracticePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAcademic MedicineMedical Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Anna T. Cianciolo
59 papers receiving 971 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 415
- Family Practice 186
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 168
- Social Psychology 162
- General Health Professions 158
Countries citing papers authored by Anna T. Cianciolo
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna T. Cianciolo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna T. Cianciolo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna T. Cianciolo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna T. Cianciolo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna T. Cianciolo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna T. Cianciolo. The network helps show where Anna T. Cianciolo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna T. Cianciolo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna T. Cianciolo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna T. Cianciolo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna T. Cianciolo. Anna T. Cianciolo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Anna T. Cianciolo
Anna T. Cianciolo is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Medical Laboratory Technology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (39 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (12 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (186 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (415 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (168 citations). Anna T. Cianciolo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Phillip L. Ackerman, Robert J. Sternberg, Glenn Regehr, Debra L. Klamen, Reed G. Williams, Olle ten Cate, Nicole K. Roberts, Asja Maaz, Ylva Holzhausen and Harm Peters. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academic Medicine and Medical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.