Teaching and Learning in Medicine

1.7k papers and 28.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 28.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k papers), General Health Professions (567 papers) and Family Practice (395 papers) specifically the topics of Innovations in Medical Education (1.1k papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (394 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (268 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teaching and Learning in Medicine are David B. Swanson, Cees van der Vleuten, Geoffrey R. Norman, William C. McGaghie, Reed G. Williams, Debra L. Klamen, Ara Tekian, Clarence D. Kreiter, Steven J. Durning and Boyd F. Richards.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teaching and Learning in Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teaching and Learning in Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025