Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz

1.4k total citations
59 papers, 936 citations indexed

About

Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 936 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 22 papers in General Health Professions and 16 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz's work include Innovations in Medical Education (41 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers) and Radiology practices and education (13 papers). Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (41 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers) and Radiology practices and education (13 papers). Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Malaysia. Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz's co-authors include David A. Morton, Scott M. Wright, Robert B. Shochet, Robert Shochet, Nicole Shilkofski, Victoria Goode, Julianna Jung, Rachel B. Levine, Anne E. Cook and Sean Tackett and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz

56 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz
Margaret Wolff United States
Tim Swanwick United Kingdom
Heather-Lyn Haley United States
Lisa D. Howley United States
Michiel Westerman Netherlands
Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz
Citations per year, relative to Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz (= 1×) peers Chris Watling

Countries citing papers authored by Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz. The network helps show where Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz. Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., et al.. (2026). Medical Student Perceptions of Psychological Safety in the Clinical Learning Environment. The Clinical Teacher. 23(2). e70342–e70342.
2.
Cook, David A., Karen E. Hauer, Arianne Teherani, et al.. (2025). Curriculum Research Solutions: Shifting From “Did It Work Locally?” to Contributing to a Scholarly Conversation. Academic Medicine. 100(8). 896–908. 1 indexed citations
3.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., et al.. (2025). Decision-Making in the Backcountry and Its Clinical Applications in Medical Education—a Pilot Experiential Learning Workshop. Wilderness and Environmental Medicine. 37(1_suppl). 75S–79S.
4.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., et al.. (2024). Integrating a self-directed ultrasound curriculum for the internal medicine clerkship. The Ultrasound Journal. 16(1). 19–19. 1 indexed citations
5.
Singh, Amteshwar, et al.. (2022). Development of a novel hospitalist advanced practice provider assessment instrument: A pilot study. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 17(3). 176–180. 2 indexed citations
6.
Pippitt, Karly, Kathryn B. Moore, Janet E. Lindsley, et al.. (2022). Assessment for Learning with Ungraded and Graded Assessments. Medical Science Educator. 32(5). 1045–1054. 2 indexed citations
7.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., S. Beth Bierer, Andrea Berry, et al.. (2021). What Is an Innovation Article? A Systematic Overview of Innovation in Health Professions Education Journals. Academic Medicine. 96(11S). S39–S47. 9 indexed citations
8.
Hannon, Peter, et al.. (2020). An objective structured clinical examination: From examination room to Zoom breakout room. Medical Education. 54(9). 861–861. 31 indexed citations
9.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., et al.. (2019). Milestone Implementation’s Impact on Narrative Comments and Perception of Feedback for Internal Medicine Residents: a Mixed Methods Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(6). 929–935. 16 indexed citations
10.
Schmidt, Robert L., Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz, Caroline K. Milne, et al.. (2017). Impact of Laboratory Charge Display Within the Electronic Health Record Across an Entire Academic Medical Center. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 148(6). 513–522. 3 indexed citations
11.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., Steven L. Baumann, Janet E. Lindsley, et al.. (2016). What's in a Transition? An Integrative Perspective on Transitions in Medical Education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 28(4). 347–352. 14 indexed citations
12.
Lindsley, Janet E., et al.. (2016). The Two-Stage Examination: A Method to Assess Individual Competence and Collaborative Problem Solving in Medical Students. Academic Medicine. 91(10). 1384–1387. 17 indexed citations
13.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M. & Steven L. Baumann. (2016). Changing medical students’ perception of the evaluation culture: Is it possible?. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 13. 8–8. 3 indexed citations
14.
Tackett, Sean, Robert Shochet, Nicole Shilkofski, et al.. (2015). Learning environment assessments of a single curriculum being taught at two medical schools 10,000 miles apart. BMC Medical Education. 15(1). 105–105. 21 indexed citations
15.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., et al.. (2015). Developing a situational judgment test blueprint for assessing the non-cognitive skills of applicants to the University of Utah School of Medicine, the United States. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 12. 51–51. 8 indexed citations
16.
Ryan, Michael S., et al.. (2015). Advising Medical Students for the Match: A National Survey of Pediatrics Clerkship Directors. Academic Pediatrics. 15(4). 374–379. 3 indexed citations
17.
Colbert‐Getz, Jorie M., et al.. (2014). Assessing Medical Students’ and Residents’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment. Academic Medicine. 89(12). 1687–1693. 74 indexed citations
18.
Carrese, Joseph A., et al.. (2014). “Am I cut out for this?” Understanding the experience of doubt among first-year medical students. Medical Teacher. 37(12). 1083–1089. 11 indexed citations
19.
Dudas, Robert A., Jorie M. Colbert‐Getz, Eric Balighian, et al.. (2013). Evaluation of a Simulation-Based Pediatric Clinical Skills Curriculum for Medical Students. Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 9(1). 21–32. 22 indexed citations
20.
Critchfield, Thomas S., et al.. (2003). A HALF CENTURY OF SCALLOPING IN THE WORK HABITS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 36(4). 465–486. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026