Kim Issroff

910 citations
18 papers · 514 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kim Issroff

17 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Kim Issroff
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 214
  • Computer Science Applications 85
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 36
  • Education 287
  • Communication 64
Replace Fleur Prinsen with:
Fleur Prinsen Netherlands
Paul Resta United States
David McConnell United Kingdom
Anniken Furberg Norway
Younghee Woo United States
Alain Breuleux Canada
William Sugar United States
Deoksoon Kim United States
Kati Mäkitalo Finland
Freydis Vogel Germany
Kim Issroff relative to Fleur Prinsen Netherlands Fleur Prinsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Fleur Prinsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Issroff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Issroff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Issroff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Issroff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Issroff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Issroff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Issroff. The network helps show where Kim Issroff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Kim Issroff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kim Issroff Line = papers co-authored together Kim Issroff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2004190
2 200591
3 200765
4
USING MOBILE DEVICES FOR LEARNING IN INFORMAL SETTINGS: IS IT MOTIVATING?
200650
5 200241
6 200726
7
Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development: Synthesis Report, Mobile Learning Week 2019
201912
8 199710
9 20037
10 19977
11 20024
12 20023
13 20212
14 19972
15 19971
16 20021
17 20061
18 20111

About Kim Issroff

Kim Issroff is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Educational Tools and Methods (2 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (2 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (214 citations), Computer Science Applications (85 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (36 citations), Education (287 citations) and Communication (64 citations). Kim Issroff has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ann Jones, Eileen Scanlon, Gill Clough, Patrick McAndrew, Marc Eisenstadt, Richard Joiner, Dominic Orr, Keith Holmes, W. Holmes and Helen Crompton. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Learning Technology, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Computers & Education, Journal of Interactive Media in Education and ALT-J.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact