This map shows the geographic impact of William Sugar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Sugar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Sugar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Sugar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Sugar. The network helps show where William Sugar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Sugar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Sugar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Sugar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Sugar. William Sugar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sugar, William & Robert L. Moore. (2015). Documenting Current Instructional Design Practices: Towards a Typology of Instructional Designer Activities, Roles, and Collaboration. ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University). 5(1).3 indexed citations
Daniels, L.M., et al.. (2012). Educational Technology professionals in higher education: Multimedia production competencies identified from a Delphi study. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2012(1). 1711–1714.5 indexed citations
Crawley, Frank E., et al.. (2009). Researcher and Researched: The Phenomenology of Change from Face-to-Face to Online Instruction.. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 10(2). 165–176.34 indexed citations
8.
Brown, Abbie, et al.. (2009). The Current State of Screencast Technology and What is Known About its Instructional Effectiveness. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2009(1). 1748–1753.10 indexed citations
9.
Sugar, William, et al.. (2009). Researcher and Researched. Quarterly review of distance education. 10(2). 165–176.
10.
Meloth, Michael S., Amy J. Good, & William Sugar. (2008). Review of Research on the Use of Video Cases to Improve Preservice and Inservice Teachers’ Knowledge and Skills. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2008(1). 940–942.1 indexed citations
Brown, Abbie & William Sugar. (2005). Integrating HCI into IDT: Charting the Human Computer Interaction Competencies Necessary for Instructional Media Production Coursework..2 indexed citations
14.
Sugar, William. (2005). Instructional Technologist as a Coach: Impact of a Situated Professional Development Program on Teachers’ Technology Use. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 13(4). 547–571.45 indexed citations
15.
Sugar, William, et al.. (2004). Examining teachers' decisions to adopt new technology. Educational Technology & Society. 7(4). 201–213.169 indexed citations
16.
Sugar, William, et al.. (2002). The Many Hats of an Instructional Designer: The Development of an Instructional Card Game.. Educational Technology archive. 42(1). 45–51.12 indexed citations
Sugar, William. (1995). Impact of User-Centered Design Methodology on the Design of Information Systems. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 32.2 indexed citations
19.
Sugar, William & Curtis J. Bonk. (1995). World Forum Communications: Analyses of Student and Mentor Interactions. 1995(1).3 indexed citations
20.
Sugar, William. (1995). User-Centered Perspective of Information Retrieval Research and Analysis Methods.. 30. 77–109.38 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.