Jos Tolboom

498 total citations
24 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

Jos Tolboom is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Jos Tolboom has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Computer Science Applications, 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Jos Tolboom's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (11 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (10 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (8 papers). Jos Tolboom is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (11 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (10 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (8 papers). Jos Tolboom collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United Kingdom. Jos Tolboom's co-authors include Erik Barendsen, Lars Bollen, Tessa H.S. Eysink, Paul Drijvers, Maria Kallia, Nataša Grgurina, David Pepper, Jeremy Hodgen, Jelle de Boer and Felienne Hermans and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Science Education, Education and Information Technologies and Thinking Skills and Creativity.

In The Last Decade

Jos Tolboom

23 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jos Tolboom Netherlands 7 171 108 81 41 22 24 268
İbrahim Çetin Türkiye 11 245 1.4× 141 1.3× 100 1.2× 67 1.6× 32 1.5× 21 338
Eugene W. Lyman United States 3 126 0.7× 74 0.7× 119 1.5× 35 0.9× 16 0.7× 5 236
Liina Malva Estonia 9 132 0.8× 149 1.4× 84 1.0× 37 0.9× 33 1.5× 15 267
Pratya Nuankaew Thailand 10 143 0.8× 55 0.5× 86 1.1× 61 1.5× 52 2.4× 54 299
Roy Mathew Oman 10 139 0.8× 69 0.6× 130 1.6× 89 2.2× 66 3.0× 21 303
Teemu Rajala Finland 11 317 1.9× 158 1.5× 89 1.1× 79 1.9× 21 1.0× 27 385
Hacer Özyurt Türkiye 8 161 0.9× 145 1.3× 148 1.8× 74 1.8× 70 3.2× 23 332
Erkki Kaila Finland 12 401 2.3× 197 1.8× 118 1.5× 109 2.7× 27 1.2× 47 490
Osama Swidan Israel 8 57 0.3× 102 0.9× 163 2.0× 25 0.6× 17 0.8× 27 243
Hassan A. El-Sabagh Egypt 3 87 0.5× 60 0.6× 113 1.4× 62 1.5× 44 2.0× 8 248

Countries citing papers authored by Jos Tolboom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jos Tolboom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jos Tolboom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jos Tolboom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jos Tolboom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jos Tolboom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jos Tolboom. The network helps show where Jos Tolboom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jos Tolboom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jos Tolboom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jos Tolboom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jos Tolboom. Jos Tolboom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Drijvers, Paul, et al.. (2024). Computational Thinking in Secondary Mathematics Education with GeoGebra: Insights from an Intervention in Calculus Lessons. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 10(2). 228–259. 2 indexed citations
2.
Drijvers, Paul, et al.. (2023). Spreadsheets in Secondary School Statistics Education: Using Authentic Data for Computational Thinking. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 9(3). 420–443. 3 indexed citations
3.
Grgurina, Nataša, et al.. (2023). Interdisciplinary Integration of Computational Thinking in K-12 Education: A Systematic Review. Informatics in Education. 15 indexed citations
4.
Tolboom, Jos, et al.. (2023). Formative Assessment Strategies by Monitoring Science Students’ Problem-Solving Skill Development. Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education. 23(4). 644–663. 1 indexed citations
5.
Tolboom, Jos, et al.. (2022). The relation between computational thinking and logical thinking in the context of robotics education. Frontiers in Education. 7. 4 indexed citations
6.
Tolboom, Jos, et al.. (2022). Exploring the effects of near-peer teaching in robotics education: The role of STEM attitudes. Informatics in Education. 3 indexed citations
7.
Grgurina, Nataša, et al.. (2021). Exploring Teachers’ PCK for Computational Thinking in Context. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 1–10. 6 indexed citations
8.
Drijvers, Paul, et al.. (2021). Computational Thinking in the Mathematics Classroom: Fostering Algorithmic Thinking and Generalization Skills Using Dynamic Mathematics Software. Radboud Repository (Radboud University). 1–9. 18 indexed citations
9.
Kallia, Maria, et al.. (2021). Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education. 23(2). 159–187. 63 indexed citations
10.
Kallia, Maria, et al.. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematical thinking: digital literacy in mathematics curricula. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 384–385. 3 indexed citations
11.
Tolboom, Jos & Michiel Doorman. (2018). The consequences of including computer-based mathematics and informatics in the STEM curriculum. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 2018. 210–221. 1 indexed citations
12.
Tolboom, Jos, et al.. (2017). Memorisation methods in science education: tactics to improve the teaching and learning practice. International Journal of Science Education. 40(2). 227–241. 4 indexed citations
13.
Drijvers, Paul, et al.. (2017). The design and use of open online modules for blended learning in STEM education. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 1 indexed citations
14.
Pepper, David, et al.. (2016). Think aloud: using cognitive interviewing to validate the PISA assessment of student self-efficacy in mathematics. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41(1). 3–16. 30 indexed citations
15.
Tolboom, Jos & Wilmad Kuiper. (2014). Quantifying correspondence between the intended and the implemented intervention in educational design research. Studies In Educational Evaluation. 43. 160–168. 3 indexed citations
16.
Boer, Jelle de, Piet Kommers, Bert de Brock, & Jos Tolboom. (2014). The influence of prior knowledge and viewing repertoire on learning from video. Education and Information Technologies. 21(5). 1135–1151. 6 indexed citations
17.
Boer, Jelle de & Jos Tolboom. (2008). How to interpret viewing scenarios in log files from streaming media servers. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning. 18(4). 432–432. 5 indexed citations
18.
Grgurina, Nataša & Jos Tolboom. (2008). The First Decade of Informatics in Dutch High Schools. Informatics in Education. 7(1). 55–74. 11 indexed citations
19.
Tolboom, Jos. (2004). An organisational model for a digital learning environment, based on a hierarchical decomposition. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning. 14(1/2). 68–68. 2 indexed citations
20.
Tolboom, Jos. (2003). How to organize a digital learning environment; from technology to use. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026