Jelle de Boer
- Geophysics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Geology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Marc J. DefantRené C. MauryPeter VogtJean‐Louis JoronPaul C. RaglandBert de BrockPiet KommersRobert L. McMaster
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (13 papers)Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (12 papers)Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers)
- Cited by
- GeophysicsGeologyAtmospheric Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Jelle de Boer
24 papers receiving 514 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Geophysics 488
- Molecular Biology 195
- Atmospheric Science 174
- Geology 145
- Artificial Intelligence 57
Countries citing papers authored by Jelle de Boer
This map shows the geographic impact of Jelle de Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jelle de Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jelle de Boer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jelle de Boer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jelle de Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jelle de Boer. The network helps show where Jelle de Boer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jelle de Boer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jelle de Boer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jelle de Boer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jelle de Boer. Jelle de Boer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | PALEOMAGNETIC DATING OF THE CERRO PRIETO VOLCANO | 0 |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 99 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | Paleomagnetism of the Quaternary Cerro Prieto, Crater Elegante, and Salton Buttes volcanic domes in the northern part of the Gulf of California rhombochasm | 20 |
| 10 | 71 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 53 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About Jelle de Boer
Jelle de Boer is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 25 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (13 papers), Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (12 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (488 citations), Geology (145 citations) and Atmospheric Science (174 citations). Jelle de Boer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Marc J. Defant, René C. Maury, Peter Vogt, Jean‐Louis Joron, Paul C. Ragland, Bert de Brock, Piet Kommers, Robert L. McMaster, Dale C. Krause and Jean‐Guy Schilling. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Earth and Planetary Science Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.