Inga J. Hoever

19 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to u...201220262016202120122014100200300400

Peers

Inga J. Hoever
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 522
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 496
  • Social Psychology 471
  • Sociology and Political Science 204
  • Strategy and Management 201
Replace Shimul Melwani with:
Shimul Melwani United States
Charalampos Mainemelis Greece
Kimberly S. Jaussi United States
Kathleen Boies Canada
Katleen De Stobbeleir Belgium
Justin M. Berg United States
Andrew Pirola‐Merlo Australia
Wendy P. van Ginkel Netherlands
Jochen I. Menges Switzerland
David P. Costanza United States
Inga J. Hoever relative to Shimul Melwani United States Shimul Melwani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Shimul Melwani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inga J. Hoever

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inga J. Hoever's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inga J. Hoever with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inga J. Hoever more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inga J. Hoever

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inga J. Hoever. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inga J. Hoever. The network helps show where Inga J. Hoever may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inga J. Hoever

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inga J. Hoever. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inga J. Hoever based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inga J. Hoever. Inga J. Hoever is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 6
3 7
4 0
5 2
6 3
7 11
8 1
9 1
10 47
11 16
12
How to know which ideas your company should pursue
1
13 3
14 83
15 14
16
Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.breakdown →
487
17 8
18 12
19 67
20
Diversity and Creativity: In Search of Synergy
2

About Inga J. Hoever

Inga J. Hoever is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Communication, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (10 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (7 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (522 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (496 citations) and Communication (178 citations). Inga J. Hoever has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jing Zhou, Daan van Knippenberg, Harry G. Barkema, Wendy P. van Ginkel, Tobias Richter, Sascha Schroeder, Hannes Leroy, Meir Shemla, Claudia Buengeler and Rolf A. Zwaan. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology and Organization Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026