Seval Gündemir
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Communication top 10%
- Co-authors
- Astrid C. HomanGerben A. van KleefCarsten K. W. De DreuEftychia StamkouCatrin FinkenauerClaudia BuengelerMark van VugtAdam D. Galinsky
- Topics
- Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Seval Gündemir
18 papers receiving 474 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Sociology and Political Science 259
- Gender Studies 208
- Social Psychology 155
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 120
- Communication 48
Countries citing papers authored by Seval Gündemir
This map shows the geographic impact of Seval Gündemir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seval Gündemir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seval Gündemir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Seval Gündemir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Seval Gündemir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Seval Gündemir. The network helps show where Seval Gündemir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Seval Gündemir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Seval Gündemir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Seval Gündemir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Seval Gündemir. Seval Gündemir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 89 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 72 | |
| 19 | 118 |
About Seval Gündemir
Seval Gündemir is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (11 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (208 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (120 citations) and Social Psychology (155 citations). Seval Gündemir has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Astrid C. Homan, Gerben A. van Kleef, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Eftychia Stamkou, Catrin Finkenauer, Claudia Buengeler, Mark van Vugt, Adam D. Galinsky, Andrew M. Carton and Ashley E. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.