H. Carrie Chen
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 1%
- Family Practice top 0.1%
- Physiology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Co-authors
- Olle ten CateHarm PetersMarieke van der SchaafReinier G. HoffHarold G. J. BokArianne TeheraniPatricia O’SullivanS. Beth Bierer
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (35 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers)Health and Medical Research Impacts (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Family PracticePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
H. Carrie Chen
43 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.8k
- General Health Professions 798
- Family Practice 770
- Physiology 296
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 286
Countries citing papers authored by H. Carrie Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Carrie Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Carrie Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Carrie Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. Carrie Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Carrie Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Carrie Chen. The network helps show where H. Carrie Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Carrie Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Carrie Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Carrie Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Carrie Chen. H. Carrie Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 82 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99breakdown → | 487 |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | The Case for Use of Entrustable Professional Activities in Undergraduate Medical Educationbreakdown → | 302 |
| 16 | 214 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About H. Carrie Chen
H. Carrie Chen is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Gender Studies, having authored 44 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (35 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (16 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (770 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.8k citations) and General Health Professions (798 citations). H. Carrie Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Olle ten Cate, Harm Peters, Marieke van der Schaaf, Reinier G. Hoff, Harold G. J. Bok, Arianne Teherani, Patricia O’Sullivan, S. Beth Bierer, Lauren A. Maggio and Alan Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Education and Medical Teacher.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.