Amin Azzam

1.5k citations
34 papers · 753 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Amin Azzam

33 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers

Amin Azzam
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Clinical Psychology 269
  • Communication 88
  • Family Practice 22
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 164
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 101
Replace Sid J. Schneider with:
Sid J. Schneider United States
Chueh Chang Taiwan
Alka A. Subramanyam India
Irene Shyu United States
Ricardo Campos Spain
Craig Burns United States
Caterina Viganò Italy
Lindsay Alexander United States
Francisco Ferre Spain
Sandra M. DeJong United States
Amin Azzam relative to Sid J. Schneider United States Sid J. Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.8×
Sid J. Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amin Azzam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amin Azzam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amin Azzam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amin Azzam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amin Azzam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amin Azzam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amin Azzam. The network helps show where Amin Azzam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amin Azzam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amin Azzam Line = papers co-authored together Amin Azzam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006126
2 201090
3 201671
4 200360
5 201660
6 199846
7 200744
8 200043
9 200723
10 201822
11 201221
12 201920
13 201119
14 201518
15 201514
16 200710
17 20219
18 20198
19 20187
20 20247

About Amin Azzam

Amin Azzam is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Communication, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 753 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (11 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (9 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (5 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Web and Library Services (4 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (269 citations), Communication (88 citations), Family Practice (22 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (101 citations). Amin Azzam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include Carol A. Mathews, Denise A. Chavira, Helena Garrido, Brooke Sheppard, Marco A. Grados, David M. Irby, Katherine A. Julian, James Heilman, William B. Rizzo and William G. Blackard. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics, Depression and Anxiety, Academic Medicine, Teaching and Learning in Medicine and Medical Teacher.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact